English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Are his civil liberties not being taken away.

2007-04-12 09:41:02 · 28 answers · asked by mbush40 6 in Politics & Government Politics

28 answers

Because the ACLU is a far, far left wing organization that wants to stamp out religion and free enterprise. They are the most vile and dangerous organization in the country.

2007-04-12 09:44:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 8

The ACLU fights against government attempts to violate the first amendment. CBS and NBC have no constitutional obligation to continue to give Imus a forum--they are the bosses, they can hire and fire as they see fit.

The ACLU is not involved because there's nothing for them to be involved in.

2007-04-12 16:47:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The ACLU ought to have had no case, that's why. Imus wasn't fired because free speech replaced into denied him, he replaced into fired because all of us have free speech. you won't be able to use the first modification to provide him the right to assert what he pleases and then deny some thing else persons our First modification precise to protest his words. finally, he replaced into fired because over 100 advertisers subsidized out of helping the coach. free speech would not propose you're thoroughly free from consequences, it in basic terms ability the authorities won't be able to throw you in detention center for speaking your recommendations. The ACLU's sole function is to guard the freedoms we are guaranteed by technique of the bill of Rights. what form of knucklehead has a difficulty with that???

2016-12-03 22:17:50 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

CBS isn't preventing him from looking elsewhere for a job.

Besides, $10 says Imus has a nice fat golden parachute in his contract.

On the other hand, if he has trouble finding a job over this issue, I wouldn't be surprised if he got ACLU backing to sue CBS.

2007-04-12 10:07:42 · answer #4 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 2 1

No they are not. The government has not been involved in silencing Mr. Imus. If another network chooses to hire him, the government isn't going to stop them.

As most Republicans liked to chirp during the Dixie Chick controversy, freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences of that speech.

2007-04-12 09:47:38 · answer #5 · answered by brian2412 7 · 6 0

No, his civil liberties are not being taken away. The government isn't involved. If they government were trying to censor him, that would be different. But this is between him and his employer.

2007-04-12 09:50:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

His civil liberties aren't really being taken away if he is being fired for saying something racist on a network. I'm against his firing, but it certainly isn't a civil liberties issue.

2007-04-12 09:48:51 · answer #7 · answered by Blackacre 7 · 4 0

His civil liberties aren't being taken away. He's not being arrested for what he said and the companies he works for have the right to decide who will work for them and what kind of image they want to present.

2007-04-12 09:55:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

It's sometimes hard to remember that freedom of speach in America is a constintutional gaurantee that the /government/ won't limit your speach. It in no way protects you from the disaproval of your fellow citizens, which is all that's happening to Imus.

2007-04-12 09:46:53 · answer #9 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 5 0

The Don Imus situation is a perfect example,
that are consequenses to conveying a stupid, antiquited,
and reactionary thought process.

2007-04-12 09:45:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

he can stand on the corner and preach racist stuff all he wants, he can even start his own magazine of hate. But he can't do it on company time. I have not heard of any criminal charges filed against him.

I am not aware of what you can and cannot say in public broadcasts, but we do have the FCC and you cannot use vulgar language. Maybe now you'll agree that we never had freedom of speach in this country to begin with; it's just that in the past you agreed with hating the things that were suppressed.

2007-04-12 09:53:17 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers