English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

Hillary says "No! I earn it! let others pay for it."

2007-04-12 09:38:22 · answer #1 · answered by Boomer 4 · 4 1

definite, it really is okay and a sturdy project that she has it to lend else the competition will be over. the precedence is that Barack is driving a wave of attractiveness and pulling in additional funds than that you'll imagine. This replaced into quite unpredicted and so she had to go back up with some funds. Her donations are sturdy and contained in the proper she should be in a position to assemble on her loan. on the different hand, marketing campaign contributions coach how sturdy a candidate is. she is going to have a harder time looking the votes mandatory to triumph over Barack's wave of attractiveness.

2016-12-03 22:17:25 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

With the money she has at this time, she could purchase health insurance for several years for everyone who does not have it.

Now think about that for a minute, she could individually solve the HEALTH INSURANCE CRISIS, singlehandedly.

I will tell you what, she might even get my vote if she did something that selfless,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,which is why I am at no risk of having to vote for her.

Great Idea, lets have all of the candidates do the exact same, every dollar raised for the presidential race goes to solve this impending world catastrophy. You could make a movie out of it, like Al, go and talk with congress, maybe do the little tear drop out of one eye, would not the money be better spent on this than spewing a million lies to Americans.

2007-04-13 09:16:14 · answer #3 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0 0

She is by winning the Presidency, then she can promote any policy she wants for the less fortunate without any Republican stonewalling. I don't see Bush or Cheney giving back any of their record oil profits to the unfortunate in New Orleans. You all have left that up to Bill Gates and Warren Buffet both Liberals.

2007-04-12 09:39:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Hillary is a money grubbing elitist. Read this:

From the NewsMax.com Staff
For the story behind the story...
Thursday, April 12, 2007 10:22 a.m. EDT
Mara: Bill and Hillary Clinton Just Wanted My Money
Mara Copeland talked on MySpace with Bill and Hillary Clinton and thought she was developing a political dialogue with the power couple.
Then she found out what the Clintons were really after: "They just wanted money,” said the San Leandro, Calif., woman. "It just seems like a big scheme to me. I was hurt – insulted and hurt.”
Copeland’s experience shows how the Clintons are using MySpace to develop relationships for cash.
Copeland told the San Leandro Times that she exchanged "personal” e-mails with Bill and Hillary and with former Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack, who supports Hillary in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination.
Then Copeland received an e-mail from Hillary’s campaign manager, saying it was urgent that Mara sent money by midnight that night. An e-mail from Vilsack said the same thing.
"I told them I couldn’t send money because my husband suffered a diabetic coma and we live on a fixed income,” Copeland said. "But we would be wiling to support her in any other way.
"Within two minutes, they told me to ‘unsubscribe.’”
Clinton raised a record $26 million in contributions during the first quarter of this year.
"Hillary said she wants to have an open discussion with the people. But after that it’s just money, money, money,” Copeland added.
"If you don’t give them money they don’t want to be near you.”

2007-04-12 09:41:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

Because the person with the most money has won the election so far. She is hoping to keep the streak going.

Lets hope she loses.

2007-04-12 09:56:58 · answer #6 · answered by az 4 · 2 0

lets you contact her and see if she will match every dollar ,we here at yahoo can donate to a the less fortunate.lets do something besides think that silly hilly cares for the poor.she is a politician.cheers beautiful

2007-04-12 09:42:41 · answer #7 · answered by decider JR 3 · 3 1

If she wins she'll be at the helm of a $2 trillion/year budget. I think that would result in much help to the less fortunate than her small camaign fund.

2007-04-12 09:48:18 · answer #8 · answered by freeetibet 4 · 0 4

She's married to Bill, who is less fortunate than that?

2007-04-12 09:39:06 · answer #9 · answered by Carpe diem 6 · 2 0

She has assembled 26 million to date for her campaign, and, can assemble tens of billions for Americans in need if elected, so, smart lady, the "cost benefit" is not hypocritical, and, worthy!

2007-04-12 09:49:18 · answer #10 · answered by Firesidechat 2 · 0 4

For the same reason that all politicians do not do that; it is a campaign fund, not a charity.

2007-04-12 10:01:25 · answer #11 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers