a heart. When first interviewed, one of the Rutgers players softly said and with much dignity, " First of all, I am not a ho. I am an athletic woman. I am also someone's daughter."
To insult young and very talented college athletes was dispicable.
2007-04-12 07:19:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Authority.
2007-04-12 14:08:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bush Invented the Google 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
A backbone.
Imus lost my respect when he began crying and apologizing due to the pressure from the PC police and Al Sharpton.
Imus should've laughed it all off, like Ann Coulter did when she called Edwards a f*ggot.
Coulter is a bigger and stronger man than Imus.
2007-04-12 14:05:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by ghostwriter 7
·
6⤊
2⤋
A backbone. It was a joke meant without insult. It was taken as opportunity. Makes me laugh at "poor me, I'm not white, I'm black so don't make a joke like we blacks do about white's. STICK YOUR GUNS Imus, and quit apologizeing, it's makeing the intellegent population sick to our stomachs.
2007-04-12 14:10:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by josh03 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
Thanks for the points, but I will take two choices. He missed the fact that Proctor & Gamble were the first to pull out as sponsor. Imas's and his wife are creating a competitive cleaning agent bussiness. 2. He has spoken out against bush, the V.P. and chuck Schumer, who is a vindictive person. THANKS.
2007-04-12 14:06:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by wmf936 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Some phat beats and a record label to justify his artistic expression and use of "nappy headed hos."
2007-04-12 14:36:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by crazycaviecool 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
He must do what Sharpton & Jackson say. They run the country, not Imus.
2007-04-12 14:09:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Suze 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
Melanin? Some black men under the guise of entertainment (ie, rappers) say terrible things about black women all the time and don't get called on it.
2007-04-12 14:19:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Shiner 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Tact
2007-04-12 14:19:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
A brain, for one thing.
The realization that the First Amendment does NOT cover hate speech, since such speech is intended to harm, defame or injure others.
2007-04-12 14:02:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋