English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Following her speech last night, she refused to answer a question about microchipping newborns for their safety against kidnapping.

She stated that she would "look into it" and called it a possible solution to the epidemic of missing children and identity thefts.

Republicans: if she actually promises this for our children, will you vote for her as President, if no other candidate has the courage to make this offer?

2007-04-12 05:30:33 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

The microchip idea is stupid and hillary is a hippy lefty who talks out both sides of her mouth.

2007-04-12 05:35:00 · answer #1 · answered by vincefoster 3 · 2 2

This "candidate" curdles my blood. I fathom enough of her mentality to have ,"The Fear".
See Evan Sayet as he explains why...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaE98w1KZ-c

National ID cards also scare me..."1984" has cameras all over Britain and some people want the same in the USA.
SCARY!

2007-04-12 05:36:52 · answer #2 · answered by acct10132002 4 · 1 0

I'm pushing for barcode tattoos as well. Most officers would rather carry the scanner than the chip reader.

2007-04-12 05:34:59 · answer #3 · answered by Studbolt Slickrock Deux 4 · 2 0

Hillary has always been a Socialist ("It Takes a Village"). I will however vote for her over Obama who is much worse.

2007-04-12 05:36:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

NO...
implanting microschips to newborn baby is not for safety...
actually US govt wants to track every person...
and if it happens.. they will interfere in our privacy..
they are fooling people... as they always do.

2007-04-12 05:38:41 · answer #5 · answered by ALWAYSKHUSH 3 · 1 0

Yeah that is what I want to be tracked like a marlin in the ocean. Yes lets do it.

2007-04-12 05:34:45 · answer #6 · answered by Barack O Bankrupt 4 · 2 0

Though I highly doubt Hillary is the Anti Christ, what next???

2007-04-12 10:02:10 · answer #7 · answered by hollybear1280 3 · 0 0

you microchip your pet to safeguard it against getting lost or stolen, so why the huff over protecting a child? I personally think Don Imus is more qualified to be president than Ms Clinton, but the issue of micrchipping children at birth does not bother me.......unless of course your pet is more important to you than your child?

2007-04-12 05:34:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

#@*! no.
I do not want brain controlling, brainwashing, and totalitarianism written for my children's lives.
Hey! Why not just turn into Brave New World?

2007-04-12 05:41:08 · answer #9 · answered by navdeepkaur 3 · 1 0

No.....I've read Revelations....maybe you should too if you think chip implants are a good idea.

2007-04-12 05:34:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers