Didn't she do enough damage with her visit to Syria or is she proving that she really is a supporter of terrorism?
2007-04-12 05:10:23 · 32 answers · asked by DeuceRider 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Anytime Jim, and save your insults for when you spam 360 pages
2007-04-12 05:20:12 · update #1
I am sure you are aware of why she is considering a visit. So, knowing I will be redundant and stating the obvious, allow me to say that the Damascus Diva is not interested in anything that might help the United States of America. Her priority is to do all she can to damage our country while attempting to do harm to President Bush. Unless she is pulled back into line by Democrats such as Ted Kennedy, she will connive, manipulate and stonewall every effort this administration attempts, no matter how noble.
She, IMO, will be shown for who and what she is, and that is a serious cancer and danger to our country. She will continue to have supporters such as Reid and Murtha who are haters of our way of life, but eventually she will be pulled in by those with some sense in her own party.
My God, what is truly scary, is she is in line for the Presidency. May God help us all!
2007-04-12 05:55:00 · answer #1 · answered by clwkcmo 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
What I saw on TV was Nancy Pelosi standing to the Left of the Multi-Billionaire who did the talking first. He SAID, that he was getting on the Plane to Iran, and looking at Pelosi, continue to said that he fully EXPECTED THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE TO ALSO GET ON THE PLANE.
There was an immediate switch of the camera to Pelose who looked very nervously at the Big Guy who Owns Her. She them moved slowly to the mike to speak. It was quite obvious that the Billionaire was the Boss, and that she acted like his Imployee!
The very next Day, the Terrorists attacked the American Green Zone in Iraq. Coincidence? NO!
2007-04-12 05:36:21 · answer #2 · answered by Sentinel 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Shes is a supporter of global terrorism, she also needs to check on her investemtn to see how her new line of bullet proof burkas are doing and lastsy to rendeveau with Jim W & his clone onu!
2007-04-12 06:14:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, her staff said she wasnt, which I hope is true. But going to Syria was a stunt and a big mistake. She got drunk with power, and this is what happens. Going to Iran would even be a bigger slap in the fact to Americans.
2007-04-12 05:18:11 · answer #4 · answered by Daniel 6 · 8⤊ 1⤋
Nancy Pelosi thinks she was elected to run the government. She doesn't know that the senate is more powerful than the house, and the President is more powerful than either. One veto by the President requires two-thirds of both houses to overcome. The president is as powerful as two thirds of the congress.
=
2007-04-12 05:20:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
Does anyone else feel like we're in a bit of a late 1930's time warp here, and that if she goes, we'll be seeing that famous Chamberlain declaring peace moment again?
2007-04-12 05:22:23 · answer #6 · answered by daisyk 6 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Rather than have the three branches of government work together (as they should) They are each pursuing their own agenda to the detriment of this country & the world.
This is just another example of self serving politics!
2007-04-12 05:16:36 · answer #7 · answered by Diamond24 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
If you can provide proof of the "damage" she did with her visit to Syria, you might get an intelligent answer to this question.
However, that's more than likely not what you are seeking, but would rather like an answer backing up your rhetorical question.
Regardless, the answer is something called diplomacy. You probably don't know what that means exactly, so here's a definition for you:
Main Entry: di·plo·ma·cy
Pronunciation: d&-'plO-m&-sE
Function: noun
1 : the art and practice of conducting negotiations between nations
2 : skill in handling affairs without arousing hostility : TACT
2007-04-12 05:15:44 · answer #8 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 2⤊ 7⤋
Pelosi has to report, to her real Boss.
2007-04-12 06:58:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is this the topic on fox news. Why is bush such a coward to have discusions with Iran. Iran is a key player in the middle east. Maybe they are planning to impeach Bush and help Iran and Syria rebuild the middle east. Like they should have done 3 years ago.Not everyone except bush is a terrorist.
He uses terror to fight terror. He should be using diplomacy to fight terror.
2007-04-12 05:18:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 7⤋