English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

then does that mean Black Holes don't exist because no one has ever seen one?

You are too dumb to answer this so don't try, just making a point.

If you defend the existence of a black hole your argument supports the UFO as well.

2007-04-12 04:48:39 · 27 answers · asked by Raymond 1 in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

Thank You for your answers, surprisingly good answers. And to those offended apologize for being rude, and it was rude, sometimes it attracts attention to a question.

2007-04-12 04:59:24 · update #1

No credible scientific evidence, that is a foolish statement, which required dropping two Atom Bombs on Japan because there was no credible scientific evidence of an Atom bomb!
They denied it. Thought it was carpet bombing. Science is not as reliable as you believe. You are locked in a rut of narrow close mindedness.

2007-04-12 05:10:18 · update #2

27 answers

I think anything can exist in the world many secrets are yet to be revealed...

2007-04-12 04:50:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Whoa, there Raymond!!

Calling people stupid simply because they don't believe in UFOs because they have never seen doesn't really correlate to your Black Hole comparison now does it....really?

To many people the existence of an ETBE is a huge stretch; scientifically, morally and in many cases religiously. Plus...to any educated person or anyone who can read a scientific journal....Black Holes have been proved mathematically; correct? While UFOs have not been proved mathematically or with hard physical evidence of the same validity as a Black Hole.

Now Raymond, are you still going to call me stupid? I just presented a reasonable argument as to why some people have a hard time believing in UFOs even while accepting the existence of Black Holes. If you do then you're a narrow minded science geek that isn't open to the possibility that not everyone believes as you do; nor should they.

By the way I believe in Black Holes because the couple of astronomy courses I took in college showed me the math. I also believe in UFOs and ETBEs having never seen any.....the odds that we are alone are too fantastic to think no one else is out there. And since I worked butt off to earn BS, MPA & an MBA in finance & math I'm pretty sure I'm not stupid.

REPLY TO RAYMOND: As I recall this is very similar to the Minniville, OR of the late'50s or early '60s and many "experts"debunked it as fake. But you saw one like this at low altitude, day light and mere 100 feet away?! Man, do I wish I was there. What was it....as I mentioned, I believe in their exsistance even though I have never seen one. I don't believe it was swamp gas, a Project Mogul dummy, a bird, plane or even Superman. I believe what you saw was a real object, with physical mass and dimensions that were observable and does not resemble any aircraft that I have ever seen. It is by definition a UFO. Is it a space craft of alien origin.....I can only imagine that it is. Must have been a hell of a thing to see up close and personal. Why do I get the feeling the second shoe is about to drop?

2007-04-12 05:14:08 · answer #2 · answered by iraq51 7 · 2 0

The question is not whether UFO sightings exist or if black holes exist.
The question is: "What are they?"

UFO sightings certainly exist, but they are only defined as Unidentified Flying Objects. Not aliens, or even airships. Only as bright lights that flit around.

On the other hand, black holes are well described by a lot of scientific evidence by very well educated people.

But I agree, it would be interesting if they were indeed intelligent life from other worlds.

2007-04-12 04:58:38 · answer #3 · answered by p v 4 · 2 0

Iraq51: Point taken, and it was just a way to get a reaction, and it succeeded.

I have a question for you: In 2002 I saw a near duplicate of this object photographed in 1965. Whether the 65 photo is fake or not, that is virtually what I saw, at approximately the same altitude, and being less than 100 feet from it in broad daylight. It is not swamp gas, thermal inversion, bird, plane, helicopter, or PROJECT MOGUL, it was seen south of Orlando, one minute duration, approximate. With all of your knowledge, what was it? Perhaps Aryans leaving from a triip to the Magic Kingdom? It had just lifted off the ground.


Rationale: You mean like police officers, Military Officers, Astronauts, Scientists, Teachers, Pilots, you mean lunatics like them?

2007-04-12 05:47:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The existence of black holes has been proved with mathematics based on how the universe works. There is no mathematcial evidence for UFO's, just visual evidence that people don't know what it is they are seeing = Unidentified Flying Objects. UFO's are not necessarily Alien vehicles, which is what you seen to be assuming.

2007-04-12 04:52:54 · answer #5 · answered by Velouria 6 · 0 1

Yep. Why is "Stupid" capitalized however?

Also I have to say that you should start referring to it as "aliens" opposed to "UFOs" because a UFO is just an object that's not identifiable and which can fly. That could be a meteor fragment, a undiscovered bird, a shoe thrown into the air and moving so quickly that it cannot be identified.

I think there is alien life by the way, outside of our planet. It might be a worm-like form of life, but I think there's SOMETHING.

2007-04-12 04:50:55 · answer #6 · answered by LD 4 · 3 0

it really is not a sparkling fact of believing if extraterrestrial beings exist or no longer. it really is slightly deeper than that once scientist make such statements, yet oftentimes human beings %. out the elements that serve their objective and discard some thing else. at the same time as scientist say the prospect of life previous Earth is very in all likelihood it really is because there have been certain strategies that had to ensue for life to exist in the global. The note 'Cosmos' comes from the Greek meaning, An orderly Universe. quite predictable, and very challenge to kinds. A universe so predictable that certain regulations are at artwork in the course of the universe. It is going to reason that the regulations and strategies at artwork the following should be at artwork in the course of the universe; for this reason, because that life replaced into able to begining the following it really is extremely in all likelihood to have began in different elements of this predictable universe. there is definitely 2 exceptions to this problem and that is a million. ) someone ought to be first, why no longer us as a lot as yet another race. 2.) we are the in elementary words ones to have survived lengthy sufficient to locate area on the project of God created the universe, it really is an similar as saying the massive Bang created the universe or the different entity you opt for. you spot, that finished idea of giving credit to someone and preventing at that factor is a religous determination, yet no longer a medical one. In technological understanding it really is not sufficient to entice close who did what yet to entice close how they did it, why they did it, and fewer than what situations it replaced into performed. If we are saying the massive bang created the universe the subsequent step is to entice close how. in case you're saying God created the universe, similar project ' How." to assert, you do not question God, that too is a religous mind-set to aviod a question. possibly the apple do not fall too a strategies from the tree. keep in recommendations the full idea of God replaced into created by technique of primitive guy to describe the unknown magic of the planet, how else ought to they explan Volcanoes, Earthquakes, Hurricanes, etc. on the instantaneous i look at technological understanding and faith as one and an identical, one makes it ensue the different solutions the way it occurred. in short, " technological understanding Eplains The Hand Of God. "

2016-12-03 21:54:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

"Just because you don't see them, you can't tell me there aren't faeries dancing on your lawn!" - NYT Editor who wrote "Yes Virginia, There Is A Santa Clause"

There is no credible scientific evidence that extraterrestrial UFOs exist. All we do have are poor quality photographs and "eyewitness" reports, neither of which constitute overwhelming evidence.

Scientists have discovered credible evidence that Black Holes exist. They have discovered acretion disks, x-ray sources, and gravimetric distortions that fit very nicely with predictive equations and theories. If black holes do not exist, these discoveries are pointing to something very strange (and unpredicted) indeed.

Extraterrestrial UFOs do not fall under any "scientific" theory. But then, you may be too....incapable of reason or logic...to understand that.

2007-04-12 04:56:59 · answer #8 · answered by jbtascam 5 · 2 2

You can also not "scientificaly" see oxygen, and you can't see the wind, just the wind blowing something, but you still KNOW that exists. UFO's could be an airplane when you don't know it's an airplane because it would tachnically then be an unidentified FLYING object. People called superman a ufo, too.

2007-04-12 04:52:32 · answer #9 · answered by Kay J. 3 · 2 0

It's amusing how you are using the descriptors of "stupid" and "narrow minded" when they fit your own argument and assumptions perfectly. I do not believe in "Space Aliens"; not because I have never personally seen one, but because most of the people who have are on the lunatic fringe without evidence.

BTW, I also have never seen a germ or a virus, but there are tests I can make to confirm their existence.

2007-04-12 05:50:37 · answer #10 · answered by RationalThinker 5 · 0 1

You know we can detect the X-Ray signatures of black holes. I have never seen any decent evidence that UFOs are anything extra-terrestrial.

2007-04-12 05:07:58 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers