English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

then does that mean Black Holes don't exist because no one has ever seen one?

You are too dumb to answer this so don't try, just making a point.

If you defend the existence of a black hole your argument supports the UFO as well.

2007-04-12 04:48:23 · 5 answers · asked by Raymond 1 in Science & Mathematics Physics

5 answers

Probably one of the most convoluted statements I've seen in a while. One has nothing to do with the other. They are independent occurances. I've never seen the tooth fairy either, but I'm pretty sure they don't exist.

UFO's.......maybe....don't know. I've not seen one, I know people that claim to have seen them, but that still doesn't sway me 100%....I'm on the fence on that one.

Black holes....yeah.....if you have read any scientific (genuine scientific publications), then you should be conveinced that this is something that is fairly well accepted now.

Seeing, or not seeing doesn't necessarily 'prove' anything. I can 'prove' to you that 1 = 2, but that doesn't make it so.

You are trying to make blanket statements, and that just doesn't carry any weight for your argument. It's full of holes and does not strike me as tho it's from someone with any real knowlege on either topic. So, even if you did make a sound argument, your poor presentation takes away from it.......sorry. If you know 100% about either, then lay your claim. Make your statement, show us why you believe what you believe.

Folks like you like to stand around and throw nebulous statements around, but when it comes time to pay the piper you're no where around.

Maybe you should go back to the drawing board. No offenses intended.

2007-04-12 05:06:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It is really not a blank statement of believing if aliens exist or not. It is a bit deeper than that when scientist make such statements, but often people pick out the parts that serve their purpose and discard the rest.
when scientist say the probability of life beyond Earth is highly probable that is because there were certain processes that had to take place for life to exist on Earth. The word 'Cosmos' comes from the Greek which means, An orderly Universe. Highly predictable, and very subject to patterns. A universe so predictable that certain laws are at work throughout the universe. It goes to reason that the laws and processes at work here have to be at work throughout the universe; therefore, since life was capable of begining here it is highly probable to have started in other parts of this predictable universe. There is of course two exceptions to this scenario and that is 1. ) Somebody has to be first, why not us as much as another race. 2.) We are the only ones to have survived long enough to explore Space
On the issue of God created the universe, that is the same as saying the Big Bang created the universe or any other entity you choose. You see, that whole concept of giving credit to someone and stopping at that point is a religous resolution, but not a scientific one. In science it is not enough to know who did what but to know how they did it, why they did it, and under what circumstances it was done. If we say the big bang created the universe the next step is to know how. If you say God created the universe, same thing ' How." To say, you do not question God, that too is a religous approach to aviod a question.
Perhaps the apple don't fall too far from the tree. Keep in mind the whole concept of God was created by primitive man to explain the unknown magic of the planet, how else could they explan Volcanoes, Earthquakes, Hurricanes, etc.
Today I look at science and religion as one and the same, one makes it happen the other answers how it happened. In short, " Science Eplains The Hand Of God. "

2007-04-12 06:20:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We have observed the effects of black holes on their surroundings ( x-rays, gamma rays) and the observations are consistent with theoretical predictions. We have also seen the stars in the center of the Milky way rotating around a very very massive object that's not observable.. This is still another observation consistent with theory. We can say with high confidence (not certainty) that they exist. We have no such data to support the existence of UFOs -- only testimony.

2007-04-12 04:53:35 · answer #3 · answered by Gene 7 · 0 0

The question isn't even if if alien craft sightings exist or if black holes exist. The question is: "What are they?" alien craft sightings relatively exist, yet they're purely defined as Unidentified Flying gadgets. not aliens, or perhaps airships. purely as wonderful lighting fixtures furniture that flit around. on the different hand, black holes are nicely defined by using assorted scientific information by using o.k. knowledgeable human beings. yet I agree, it may well be exciting in the event that they have been certainly smart existence from different worlds.

2016-10-21 23:04:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Stupid people also say god does not exist because they have never seen him either.

2007-04-12 04:52:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers