is mr. bush bringing america closer to waterloo situation by invading or attacking iran?

Answer 1

Napoleon really tried to win at Waterloo, but lost. It was his last battle; he had been defeated before and returned from exile to try again.
The US hasn't really tried for a military victory yet, because it wants a political victory rather than a military one.
"Beware the fury of a patient man."

Answer 2

Iran is a loose cannon even without Nukes. If they ever get them, they will use them covertly through terrorist groups worldwide. Maybe at the Olympics, maybe at the Superbowl, maybe in NYC, Paris, London, Madrid, Israel, or anywhere they so desire. The free world is at serious and imminent risk of massive and multiple attacks that will make 9/11 look like a picnic. We are at WAR WITH THE RADICAL MUSLIMS for our survival!!! They want us DEAD! The War will last for generations until either the radical Muslims or we have been killed. Iran's leadership is absolutely radical Muslim. Iran CANNOT AND WILL NOT be allowed to EVER possess nuclear weapons of any kind.

President Bush is one of the good guys. History will prove he is one of the greatest Presidents we have had the privilege to elect. He's got a pair of balls and a Texas attitude that you liberal and socialistic wimps just cannot comprehend. He’s a Warrior and will do what is best for the Country. He will not compromise his integrity or his ethics for appeasement of other politicians. Go strap on an F-16 like he has and you may just get a glimmer of what he's really like. I’ve met him in Austin when he was Governor on 4 different occasions. He looks you in the eye, he’s got a really strong handshake, he’s friendly and has a great sense of humor. I like him as a person and as a President.

Answer 3

This subject is dividing our people in half and creating alot of fusion. I think if Bush's new surge of troops doesn't produce new results he will make up an excuse to go into Iran and create a reason to fight them just like he did with Iraq. We aren't even going after the people who started all of this anymore. We are still there fighting to keep Bush from looking stupid.

Answer 4

Good morning...You are referring to our President Bush..right? Let's put your question in another point of view. Iran wants nuclear resources but doesn't want to follow the UN's quidelines or rules regarding to this issue. As you well know, we have had the same problem with N.Korea. Now with this in mind and we all know why both these countries want "nuclear resources"..(more power for themselves) as well as to manipulate other countries, why would you ask that question? President Bush may be secretly talking to his administration on the possibility of 'war" with Iran but right now it's only an option or an idea. I really don't think that President Bush wants to start or initiate another WWIII. Now, Iran on the other hand wants it "their way" or "no way" there is no in between for them. Our country wants to resolve this Nuclear issue the safe and correct way not a "war" if it can be helped. We (the US) and Britain as well as other countries have tried to negotiate the diplomatic way but with no results. Iranians government are not diplomatic inclined so do speak. Iran likes to play "little head games" with the US as well as others stating one thing but doing another or visa versa. They are liars, deviate, sly and untrustworthy to where they want you to see one thing but yet it's not the "real thing". They really "put on a show" with the release of the British captures and Iran wanted us to see "the good thing they did" by releasing them but yet had other intentions. They are "fakes"! Now, with this in mind, do you really want them to have "nuclear resources" available to them? I would think not but then again, this is my own opinion. Have a blessed day!

Answer 5

you should allow iran to have nukes, right?