Why do some people get their global warming news from political websites?

Question

like the CATO institute, newsmax, and CATO created junkscience.com?

Scientific organizations in the geologic, climatic, and meteorologic field have come in support of man made global warming NUMEROUS TIMES. Now, who are you going to believe? ENTIRE scientific organizations with their hundreds and thousands of scientists or political pundits and a small and diminishing minoritiy of INDIVIDUAL scientists who doubt the extent of man's contribution?

Here is a list of meteorologic institutions. It's just a list. If you truly want to know what the majority of scientists think on man made global warming, check out their official websites. Go to their websites and then look for news or press releases and see what they say on global warming.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_meteorology_institutions

Example: The American Meteorological Association

New AMS Statement on Climate Change: Climate is Changing; Humans Play a Role
Despite uncertainties, there is adequate evidence from observations and interpretations of climate simulations to conclude that the atmosphere, ocean, and land surface are warming; that humans have significantly contributed to this change; and that further climate change will continue to have important impacts on human societies, on economies, on ecosystems and on wildlife through the 21st century and beyond, according to a new information statement on climate change issued by the American Meteorological Society today.

http://www.ametsoc.org/amsnews/newsreleases.html

Tyrus,

It's just a list of meteorological scientific organizations. Once you know their exact name, you are free to go to their OFFICIAL sites.

EXAMPLE: The American Meteorological Association
http://www.ametsoc.org/amsnews/newsreleases.html

Don't even trust wikipedia with a list? Well google for well establish geologic, climatic, or meteorological scientific organizations. Once you know who the players are, go to their official websites.

Answer 1

If you do it has no credibility, since opinions aren't science.

Answer 2

It is almost unfortunate that Al Gore brought the global warming issue to our attention rather than someone who wouldn't cause people to immediately make it some kind of political issue.

Other scientists had been attempting to enlighten society on what was going on - but it took someone with a high profile like gore to really get it out there.

The right-wing assault was inevitable.

Their denial that the problem exists however is unconscionable.

Answer 3

Opinion is not proof. Opinion is not science. Computer models are not proof.

AMS is funded by the EPA. They are not looking for the truth. They have already decided what the answer is and are simply trying to support it. That is not how scientific research is supposed to work.

.

Answer 4

Dig deeper pal, and you'll discover the sources that fund your scientific organizations, of which support the globalist agenda...and FYI, anything related to "wikipedia" can be classified as BS, due to the public being able to alter, make-up, and add what ever they want...

Answer 5

Now that Newt Gingrich is calling for conservatives to join the fight against global warming, there might not be much to debate about on the subject, other than how to reduce emissions.

Answer 6

sturdy luck debunking this it replaced into written by using Richard Lindzen, he's the pinnacle of atmospheric technology at M.I.T. i be attentive to which you will not examine it because you have already made up your concepts on the difficulty only theory you are able to a minimum of be attentive to that it is not a provided that there is guy brought about worldwide warming.

Answer 7

Because Al Gore said it is wrong to listen to and understand the evidence.

Dems never had to think about this issue. Al told them what to think --- just like Hitler would have done for his people.