oh yea? Finally an educated pope. Kudos
2007-04-11 11:38:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by mitchellinho 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
The Catholic Church said that the theory of Evolution was an acceptable choice almost 60 years ago.
The Catholic Church does not take the stories of creation in the Bible literally. Catholics believe the book of Genesis tells religious truth and not necessarily historical fact.
One of the religious truths is that God created everything and declared all was good.
Catholics can believe in the theory of evolution. Or not. The Church does not require belief in evolution.
On August 12, 1950 Pope Pius XII said in his encyclical Humani generis:
The Teaching Authority of the Church does not forbid that, in conformity with the present state of human sciences and sacred theology, research and discussions, on the part of men experienced in both fields, take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter - for the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God.
Here is the complete encyclical: http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_12081950_humani-generis_en.html
The Church supports science in the discovery of God's creation. At this time, the theory of evolution is the most logical scientific explanation. However tomorrow someone may come up with a better idea.
As long as we believe that God started the whole thing, both the Bible and modern science can live in harmony.
With love in Christ.
2007-04-11 18:17:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by imacatholic2 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are some people who still believe the dinosaurs didn't exist because they aren't mentioned in the Bible, even though we have physical proof that they did exist. Faith is fine, but you can't simply write off everything else despite physical evidence just because of your faith. Somehow you have to mesh the two.
People seem to forget that the Bible is a collection of letters written by human beings, not by a supreme being. There have also been some poor translations and some intentional mistranslations over the centuries.
Throughout history there have been people who misuse and corrupt religion as a way to control others and gain wealth and power. Remember, not everything in life is black or white.... there's a lot of gray area out there.
2007-04-11 11:51:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Erika B 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
>What’s incorrect with believing in creation And Evolution? You mean, different than that the former of the two has in truth no evidence to help it and a great volume of evidence against it? >The Bible makes use of metaphor, parable, and symbolism to describe divine fact (that's a secret). Then the question turns into, WHY did it use metaphor, parable and symbolism? does not it have been lots extra straightforward, and much less complicated and deceptive, if God had only reported the top fact in the Bible devoid of disguising it in any way? there's no reliable rationalization why the 1st financial disaster of Geneis would desire to not initiate '13 billion, seven-hundred and 80-seven million, fifteen thousand 8 hundred and ninety-six years in the past, God created the Universe out of a tiny factor via increasing area and dividing the 4 user-friendly forces out of the primordial quantum vacuum'. Why did God not write precisely that? no count if it is so significant that we have got confidence in him, why does he look attempting so puzzling to cover himself from us? It only does not compute. A deistic god is notably extra lifelike, and the main smart perspective in any respect is that no gods exist in the 1st place. >pondering Genesis replaced into written approximately 5000 years in the past, doesn’t it make experience it does not clarify evolution if that replaced into the case? Excuse me. If the deity you're talking approximately replaced into useful adequate to create the entire Universe out of nowhere, certainly he does not enable himself be dissuaded via the scientific lack of expertise of primitive civilizations? The Bible is meant to be a e book of revelation and non secular fact, yet if what you're asserting is the case, then curiously God has desperate that coddling to early civilizations' loss of scientific expertise is extra significant than pointing out the surely info. Like I say, it only does not upload up; no actual deity might do something like that. >Is the Bible a technological expertise e book, a history e book, or a non secular e book approximately God’s dating to human beings? If it fairly does signify divine revelation from an omnisceint deity, there's no reliable rationalization why it won't be all 3, and there is maximum actually no reliable rationalization why it might get lots of the 1st 2 downright incorrect. Writing blatant scientific and historic falsehoods right into a e book isn't a reliable thank you to get human beings to hearken to its non secular message, and a supremely smart deity might understand that.
2016-10-28 11:20:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pope John Paul II came out with the possibility that creation and evolution exists at the same time....if evolution were true, then God created it and planned it that way. I don't really see a conflict there, in fact, it makes a lot more sense than anything else I've heard on the extremes of either side.
2007-04-11 11:39:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Greenwood 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I taught evolution in the Catholic school system for a number of years. This is nothing new for the Catholics. Various heads of the Catholic Church in Rome have told their adherents that they support the teaching of evolution over the past decade. The article you cited says absolutely nothing about abortion and condoms.
2007-04-11 11:56:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I went to a Catholic school, and they taught evolution and the age of the universe. No problems there.
It's the Protestants who often fork intelligent design.
Not that the former will ever accept condoms, unfortunately.
2007-04-11 11:41:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dalarus 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Where in the bible does it say their was no evolution.....? I'm very Christian, and I believe it, I don't believe that we all came from little tadpoles that hoped up to the land, I believe the earth was created as as in says In Genesis. Why do we limit put limits on what God can do? God is limitless!! I believe all creatures change according to their environment. I believe that God caused the Big Bang.
2007-04-11 11:51:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Just for the record, The Catholic Church has never said evolution was wrong or contradictory to the Faith. They sort of learned their lesson with Galileo
2007-04-11 11:48:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by freemanbac 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Pope Benedict is simply saying that God created life by simple evolution,he is not saying that life just evolved by it`self,it is still creationism.
2007-04-11 11:40:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sentinel 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
nope, i came from a catholic school (but i'm a christian), and what they teach is progressive creationism. They’re saying a day in the Lord is not like the length of a day we all know. It’s kind of hard to explain, but basically it’s like a mix of evolution & creation. See the Genesis Interpretation part of the link below.
And they don’t take Genesis as a historical book. Sad to say (or quote), narrow are the gates too righteousness.
But I advise you to look to Christ, not to people, as you further your belief. The Bible holds the truth. He doesn’t lie, never did.
2007-04-11 11:41:46
·
answer #11
·
answered by its_not_rocket_surgery 3
·
0⤊
3⤋