The theory of evolution claims that life is formed by chance. According to this claim, lifeless and unconscious atoms came together to form the cell and then they somehow formed other living things, including man. Let us formulate an “experiment” on this subject under the heading of “Darwinian formula” and let us examine on the behalf of evolutionists what they really claim without their actually having spelled it out:
2007-04-11 07:46:34 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
"The theory of evolution claims that life is formed by chance. "
Bzzt. Wrong.
Still ignorant, huh? I suppose now we have a whole 'nother set of these stupid spams of yours to look forward to.
2007-04-11 07:48:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 0⤋
The theory of evolution doesn't claim anything about the origin of life. That is called abiogenesis. And it doesn't claim that atoms came together to form the cell. The cell evolved from simpler life forms. And this has been successfully accomplished in experiments.
2007-04-11 15:51:29 · answer #2 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Evolution does not claim that atoms came together to form a cell. Although microscopic, single celled organisms are very complex. Studies in chemistry and abiogenesis strongly suggest that about one billion years of precursor events were required to evolve the first cell. These precursor events were not the chance coming together of atoms, but a function of how biochemistry, chemical evolution and abiogenesis works. Find some research on the chemical origins of nucleotides and the RNA phenotypic world that preceded single celled life and you may understand.
2007-04-11 14:54:16 · answer #3 · answered by Dendronbat Crocoduck 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. For the billionth time on here...
EVOLUTION DOES NOT EQUAL ABIOGENSIS.
EVOLUTION... ONLY applies to already living things. It says that life has slow mutations that can sometimes result in new species but usually result in the death of said species over time.
ABIOGENESIS... talks about the beginning of life. Abiogenesis remains a hypothesis, meaning it is the working assumption for scientists researching how life began. If it were proven false, then another line of thought would be used to modify or replace abiogenesis as a hypothesis. If test results provide sufficient support for acceptance, then that is the point at which it would become a theory.
Before you start spouting off about stuff you obviously know nothing about, please at least do the research to become informed about a subject or you only make yourself look like a fool.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogensis
2007-04-11 15:07:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm pretty sure evolution only deals with variations of life, not the creation of life from nothing. That's abiogenesis and you're right, it's as-yet unproven.
Evolution on the other hand, has been proven yet the mechanics of it aren't 100% known yet.
Btw, what is this experiment exactly? You seem to cut yourself short.
2007-04-12 04:09:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"The theory of evolution claims that life is formed by chance. "
No, it doesn't.
Evolutionary theory doesn't make any claims about how the very first lifeforms came to be.
Evolutionary theory claims that the frequency of allelles in a population, over time, changes.
Why would you lie? Or are you just confused?
2007-04-11 14:49:55 · answer #6 · answered by LabGrrl 7 · 7⤊ 0⤋
Evolution claims that all species evolved from simpler ones, and are continuing to evolve into ones adapted to their environments through natural selection.
Your 'claim' has NOTHING to do with evolution. I suggest you read Darwin's book before commenting additionally; I provide a link below.
2007-04-11 14:56:04 · answer #7 · answered by nora22000 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Darwin's Theory of Evolution is the widely held notion that all life is related and has descended from a common ancestor: the birds and the bananas, the fishes and the flowers -- all related. (read the rest of this article http://www.darwins-theory-of-evolution.com/)
2007-04-11 14:51:00 · answer #8 · answered by brentwoodgirl2000 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Until and unless you actually either read a book on the subject, attend a course or in some other way become informed, you really would serve yourself by not discussing an issue in such a way as to make yourself appear to be ignorant, naive and foolish. Wouldn't you agree?
2007-04-11 14:50:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
It's a little too complicated to explain in a forum like this. Here's a couple of sites with info on what the theory of evolution is about.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/
http://evolution.berkeley.edu/
2007-04-11 14:53:35 · answer #10 · answered by Jess H 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋