It is one thing to Grandstand over taxes, but to stall the mechanism supporting our Brave men and women in uniform, being true Patriots, men and women of courage, character, and True Grit, to be stabbed in the back by Democrats is unconscionable.
2007-04-11 06:47:37 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
you dumb democrats you cant put an end date on a war that lets the enemy know they won the war why dont you jackasses think for once and most of the troops really dont mind being there or at least the infantry i didnt mind being there for 24 months out of 36 months and i am sitting in afganistan as of now and i am waiting for my next trip to help the iraqi people start a new life without saddam.
b co 2/508th pir 82d airborne ft bragg nc
2007-04-11 07:42:10 · answer #1 · answered by Paratrooper 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They aren't stabbing them in the back. They are trying to remove them from harm's way by setting a deadline for their removal. Remember who was primarily responsible for them being put in harm's way in the first place? That is, of course, your friend George Bush and his lying cohort of schemers intent on dragging America into an unnecessary conflict and taking their eyes off the real prize, Osama bin Laden and friends in Afghanistan and its environs. It's Dubya who is being recalcitrant here. Congress offered him the funding. He just won't accept it with the strings attached. Too bad! There is a new Dog in Washington, and it is trying to do the will of the American people, who no longer support Dubya's fiasco by a rather substantial majority. This Congress chooses not to obey the will of Dubya and his thieving corporate friends. That's not their job! They were elected to serve the people, not an incompetent president. Dubya derives whatever authority he has left from the consent of the people, who no longer consent to perpetuating the debacle in Iraq. The people giveth and the people taketh away!
2007-04-11 14:15:12 · answer #2 · answered by MathBioMajor 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is plenty of money until July , the Democrats will never hold back money for the troops. Bush is a idiot and want sign to bring our troops home in 2008. Yesterday the Shites
marched and almost had a riot wanting the American invaders out of Iraq. Why stay when they aren't wanted, have you signed up to check out to Iraq, have you. Big talk behind that computer , talk is big showing is a man , are you ready to be a man. If you are than go sign up, get your uniform , rifle and hit it on out.
2007-04-11 13:55:54 · answer #3 · answered by Nicki 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush is the one who vetoed the money. He is the one stalling the process. All because the democrats put in accountability and limited time, which is what they were elected into the majority to do.
2007-04-11 13:52:09 · answer #4 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
THe person above me Nicki is a moron. To use a protest by Al Sadr to represent all of Iraq is the equivalant of using a rally by the KKK to represent all of America.
2007-04-11 13:57:49 · answer #5 · answered by Relax Guy 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Go back and ask the Big Texan (Bush) he is the one that started all of this
2007-04-11 13:59:28 · answer #6 · answered by shorty 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
that's funny, my soldier in Iraq (friend) plays Texas Hold'em all the time there. Says he looses too much, so he asked for me to send him a book to get bettah at it.
2007-04-11 13:51:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
They haven't run out of funding. You know this right?
Get your shi* straight before posting complete bullshit.
2007-04-11 13:53:11 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋