How do you think of there not being a creator with all the evidence of being one. There are billions of stars in the universe and what are the odds that as far as we can see with the worlds biggest telescopes we are the only little planet that can have life. Sounds like a creator to me. Would you take the same odds on anything elese one and a couple of billion?
2007-04-10 21:05:20 · 21 answers · asked by Joe B 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
They(Scientists) believe that there may very well be some minute forms of life on Mars and Jupiter's moon Europa, and other places just in our own solar system. Wake up dude! Your argument is simply not a good one. I do believe in God however.
2007-04-10 21:11:47 · answer #1 · answered by Rock N' Roll Junkie 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
There is not a shred of evidence for a creator. Science already offers working models of the laws of physics and the universe, and with them the world can be explained quite fine, and they are refined continuously. The idea of a creator, on the other hand, explains nothing and only adds more questions.
Regarding the probability of life on our planet, probabilities are only relevant BEFORE the event. AFTER the fact, a probability is always 100 per cent. What you do is like throwing one hundred dice, looking at the result whatever it is, and then announcing: Wow! This result is extremely improbable, like one in a gazillion, it must be magic!
2007-04-11 04:14:29 · answer #2 · answered by NaturalBornKieler 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
There really isn't quite evidence of there being a creator. I mean for everything the religious state, can be explained by science. Stars are just luminous balls of plasma. We don't know that we are the only planet with life, there are billions, possibly trillions, of other galaxies. Everything is just based on facts, figures, numbers. Not guesstimates and faith in one creator. I'm Agnostic, I think everyone should be because it is a neutral playing field, everyone says be open-minded, when trying to get you to believe what they believe, when they aren't being the open-minded ones. But relating back to the topic, there is no evidence of a god. Once you find physical proof, feel free to contact me. Actually, PLEASE contact me if you find proof.
2007-04-11 04:21:57 · answer #3 · answered by Jessica Danielle 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think you miss the point, especially when you bring something concrete as math into the equation.
You cannot make an arguement using reason (statistical probability) only to refuse its use to the extent that simply because one believes that a creator exists does not, ipso facto, mean that one's idea about a creator is true.
I would say many agnostics do not believe in God because the 'God' being offered to them, by others who do, is contradictory, illogical, hypocritical, and a selective user of the facts to suit their purpose, as illustrated by their representatives.
In other words, when given a choice to believe in a God presented quite poorly or none at all, many choose B as their answer.
2007-04-11 04:29:02 · answer #4 · answered by Khnopff71 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is only one planet that can support life? who told you that? - we only know of very few planets - they are very difficult to detect as they do not emit light like stars. most scientists accept that life will probably start on a planet if it has water and is not too hot or too cold.
also we can not prove if there is or is not a creator of the universe - however we are not going to assume we know what that creator is. it could be several aliens it could be a bread of mice (see hitch hikers guide to the galaxy)
we can not even prove we exist as we think we do - we could all be in a matrix controlled by robots (see the matrix) - after all we only perceive what is going to our brains through our senses.
so to assume there is ONE god is being incredibly presumptuous
2007-04-11 04:16:55 · answer #5 · answered by cool321steve 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
"For all who do not believe in God?" is not a question.
"How do you think of there not being a creator with all the evidence of being one." is a sort of a question. Not a very good one, but a question none the less.
How old are you? I do hope that you are still in school and that you start paying attention in your English classes.
2007-04-11 04:43:06 · answer #6 · answered by Goodman Green 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And you know that no other planet has life because...?
The world's biggest telescopes can't even define planets in other systems because the distances are that huge.
There is absolutely no evidence of a creator. None at all.
2007-04-11 04:08:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
What is the evidence you are talking about? The god thing? Who created him? Humans?
How about the universe are the beginning and the ending and time and space starts when the universe were there, then the universe start to divide and billions of years later it is what we are seeing now?
2007-04-11 04:15:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I look at things this way..... I dont have the need to believe in any creator. I believe in my family, friends, and so many things that bring goodness to my life. Would it make me any a better person if I did believe in God? I was bought up very strict catholic and although I have lost religion along the way, I still consider myself a very good and loving person. Just ask my family. *smiles*
2007-04-11 04:17:10 · answer #9 · answered by Leah 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Best you go to the astronomy and space sections and learn a little more about telescopes, radio telescopes and distances within space before spouting a whole lot of cr*p.
2007-04-11 04:17:22 · answer #10 · answered by GOD 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋