I agree wth your comments...Rather be a War Mongering Chickenhawk...than a Yellow Bellied Cowardly Traitor....I know I did my part to save the wasted liberal Flesh
2007-04-10 14:13:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
I served in Iraq twice and I do wish more would serve in the armed forces but it is still a personal choice we do have an all volunteer military. This is an argument that can go both ways. Why does Al Gore and Nancy Pelosi live in huge houses and fly in a personal jets, but then spout off Global Warming drivel? Also, those that are against the Iraq war and the removal of a despotic dictator also wine about Sudan and Zimbabwe and how they need more peacekeepers? Hello peacekeepers are soldiers and to work properly they need the option to fight if necessary to keep the peace. Sanctions only go so far at some point to give freedom you may have to do it at the point of a gun because if they dont they will just sit back and do nothing like in Rawanda.
2016-04-01 08:01:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
ok i would support a war if it had a purpose and it was a necessity. War is the last option. not the first one. We should think about a war and if we send in troops the war should be worth their life a recent poll said that 61% of Iraqi's think it is worse so obviously the war was not very well thought out and calling u a chicken hawk war mongering right winger i personally have never heard of that expression and ur just as bad for stereotyping all liberals as ******* who can't take a stand
2007-04-10 14:23:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Atanomed 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
The term chicken Hawk can mean an old man who sleeps with young boys. Be careful using that term. It has become popular with ignorant Conservative radio personalities, who relay don't believe in what they preach but make a ton of money off of good Americans. Just an FYI,
2007-04-10 16:13:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by GrapeMSH 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'm a libertarian that shares the views of some libs in this case. The U.S. foreign policy is ridiculous, we are all about trying to dominate the world when in reality we cause all the problems. Its history repeating itself all over again. Rome, Napoleon, the list could go on and on and on. Bring home the troops, put them at our borders.
2007-04-10 14:14:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Like I have said before, its a hypocritical remark calling a non-military pro-war conservative a chicken hawk. They claim the Bush Admin is fascist, but their "chickenhawk insults" are basically the same thing. They are saying that everyone who has this certain opinion must be fighting in the war. So I guess my 70 year old grandfather better go grab his gear.
2007-04-10 14:13:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by cliffburtongodofthebass 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
fight in Afganistan right, Iraq wrong. Questioning the valididty of declaration of war is to protect life or limb, and resources. There are plenty of Democrats who fought in Iraq...under BI and BII, and I campaigned with them. Look at Tammy Duckworth who lost legs in helicopter crash, and comes back to US to run for Democratic seat. She is not American Hating pansy. Democratics don't just preach religion, democracy and freedom, but defend it, thank you very much.
2007-04-10 14:48:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by dan b 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Sorry, I am not a "chicken hawk war-mongering right winger" either.
2007-04-10 14:17:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by WMD 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Me to A Viet Nam Vet US Navy
2007-04-10 14:49:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by 1st Buzie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hooah! Thats all I have to say. I even got called an uneducated back woods baby killing fantasist. I guess because I don't have a liberal education and I only have two Bachelor's one in History and one In CJ who knows. ....... Shadow Stalker
2007-04-10 14:15:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by srtfugitiverecoveryagency 4
·
1⤊
1⤋