2007-04-10 11:31:37 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
It wasn't so much the orange sweatpants as it was the holes in the orange sweatpants!
2007-04-10 11:35:46 · answer #1 · answered by glitterkittyy 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. He wore the womans robe because He had to represent God to the men. They would laff if He wore sweatpants, but not if He wore womans garb.
2007-04-10 18:39:54 · answer #2 · answered by Lukusmcain// 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Jesus had nothing to be ashamed of; He is the Son of God! He would have worn his orange sweat pants proudly.
2007-04-10 18:36:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The apostles had purple ones, why would they laugh? BTW, I love sweats.
2007-04-10 18:36:10 · answer #4 · answered by Me 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't think the laughing would have been the problem. It would have been the trendsetting than how would he be different?
2007-04-10 18:39:39 · answer #5 · answered by fairykind 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. He had a hole in his underwear and hadn't washed them for a few weeks.
2007-04-10 18:36:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have taken this scripture out of context!
From a Bible believing born-again Christian!
Q, you are High- larious.
I think your questions lovely and preposterous. Please forgive me for not taking you serious.
2007-04-10 18:56:18 · answer #7 · answered by thankyou "iana" 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Keep it goin Q, i had a feeling you'd be here soon!
2007-04-10 18:34:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
They were orange? I thought they were neon pink?
2007-04-10 18:35:36 · answer #9 · answered by Spring loaded horsie 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. They didn't have sweatpants then.
2007-04-10 18:37:05 · answer #10 · answered by RB 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋