English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What will happen if the arctic ice cap melts completely, the scientists are speculating that it could happen in as little as 13 years!

So what consequences would it have for the world?

2007-04-10 07:27:43 · 6 answers · asked by azman5998 3 in Environment

6 answers

The arctic cap is already over water, sea levels would not rise significantly should the arctic cap melt. However, warm water is less dense than cold water, if the water were to rise above 4º C the sea levels would rise a little bit.

However, Greenland is further south than the Arctic Ice cap, and is melting pretty fast. The loss of Greenland ice has been accelerating, and could raise ocean levels more than two feet. That is a lot of water.

In addition, if the arctic ice were to melt, likely so would the antarctic ice. Antartica is a large continent, with lots of ice. Its loss would raise ocean levels many feet.

The ice is not likely to melt away in only 13 years. However, melting is likely to continue to accelerate. We can count on a lot of changes. Some of this is just part of a natural cycle over which we have little control.

Most of it, however, is part of an unnatural cycle over which we have very little control, in large part because those who have the power to institute change find the truth inconvenient.

2007-04-10 08:08:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

they only developed the technologies to degree the quantity of Arctic ice in the Nineteen Seventies. on account that at that factor they have been panicking approximately worldwide cooling, you will assume the ice at that factor may well be thicker than that's now. The globe has certainly warmed and as you will assume, this is melted some ice. The question is - will it proceed to get heat as Al Gore's action picture anticipated or will or not this is extra like the UN IPCC type or will it as a replace bypass right into a cooling era? Of the three, i think of we are finding on the third risk, average to severe cooling lasting for some years and with lots worse effects than warming. I assume the refrain to p.c.. up that music in the subsequent 300 and sixty 5 days or so if this is genuine, yet I think of they're going to discover the only answer is for the UN to bypass forward and take over what you are able to and can't do on a on a daily basis foundation, the comparable as with warming.

2016-10-28 08:54:22 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The consequences for people would be minor. No sea level rise, because the ice is floating on the water now. Weather patterns would probably change, but nobody can say for sure if the new pattern would be better or worse. Consequences for wild life would be worse, because wildlife is not as adaptable to change as humans.

2007-04-10 08:09:47 · answer #3 · answered by campbelp2002 7 · 1 0

Yup! It is melting and it too will raise world sea levels. The fish and other wildlife will disappear along with the ice.
Of course the governments will have more land to dig for oil in and other minerals plus a new sea route for ships will open up but they could could care less about the environment or living things.

2007-04-10 07:37:24 · answer #4 · answered by dragon 5 · 1 1

No .. that's Al Gore .... 32 years he says. The arctic cap would simply open a channel over the North Pole and nothing else.

2007-04-10 07:36:20 · answer #5 · answered by Gene 7 · 1 1

Besides most coasts will flood with several feet of water?

It won't happen in the next 13 years - anyone who says that is overly alarmist. But it will eventually melt unless we do something. More likely in 2113 than 2013.

2007-04-10 07:35:25 · answer #6 · answered by Brian L 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers