Does the Separation of Church & State promote Atheism, Religion, Neither, or Both? Please explain your answer.

Answer 1

It does neither. The exact intent of the separation was to not promote or impeded the expression of any religion or lack thereof. The basic message that Jefferson wanted to impress is that religion is a personal matter, between each person and his/her god and the government was not to establish or prevent the expression of any religion (that is not to say that many religions have been suppressed).

Answer 2

Neither. It has nothing to do with the choices people make. It's simply a way of ensuring that no single religion is allowed to make its views "official," and thereby force itself on secular society. It was a lesson learned from experience!

"Separation of church and state means don't let anything that have to do with the church enter our justice system."

Wrong. Our government is NOT corrupt because of atheism! In many states, you can't even hold public office as an avowed atheist. And one glance at the shady workings of the Christian Coalition, and that sleazeball Ralph Reid, proves that when religion IS allowed to intrude on government, the results are usually quite unwholesome.

Answer 3

No it would not The tax exempt status is a authorities waiver which ought to be petitioned that signifies that each and each employer is in concept taxable, which does no longer deny the life or operation of the employer in question, ergo the freedom to examine a company/faith is real and alive That the authorities makes a tax exemption and gadgets regulations, is it really is authorities prerogative, which does no longer violate the separation of church and state you won't be able to elect this as a discrimination both. evaluate you've 10 ppl that are in debt with you (TAX) and also you placed a level by technique of that you'll opt for to pardon the debt (tax exemption) in case you opt for to waiver 8 out of 10, that's your corporation organization, you aren't from now on obliged to (i'm no longer going into the undeniable truth that politics can/will impression the decision in awarding tax exempt status, yet that's no longer on the middle of the "separation" question) Btw i do not stay contained in the U. S., in basic terms an ex regulation pupil Peace Edit I forgot to coach that "the separation of state & church", is only a idea which could fluctuate very much from state to state or us of a to us of a do not fool yourselves, both were tremendous fans contained in the previous, and both attempt to rule your lives, the church would were "formally" banned from workplace, yet remains the biggest political celebration. The evidence is, in all that the Atheists are bitching about the following on YA 24/7,that they had experience free if all ties were severed Peace

Answer 4

The separation of Church adn State ultimately promotes both atheism and religion as it allows each member of society to freely study, believe and practice his/her religion or none at all.

Answer 5

I would say neither....I thought separation of church and state meant that laws should not be made according to ones religion....I don't really think it promotes ones beliefs one way or another....

Answer 6

Unfortunately, I think there is evidence that it promotes religion. If you look at European countries with a state religion, the UK, Holland, Sweden, and France they all show significantly lower rates of church attendance and theistic belief than the US.

Answer 7

It supports freedom of choice.
It supports your right to worship as you wish, or not to worship anything at all, without the state deciding what you may or may not worship.
It also is to protect us from one group obtaining dominance, and mandating our government according to thier views, and thier good, instead of with a view to the common good.
Or at least that's what it's supposed to do.

I thought Geoffrey's thought interesting, that in not mandating a religion, there are more people that consider themselves spiritual, or more participation, for the reason of not having one way forced on us over another...interesting. Looked at that way, perhaps it does promote religion as a thing, but not one over another....

Answer 8

Sorry there is no separation of church and state. it is a mirth. Do a web search, Church and State and see what I mean. The first amendment states that no law shall be made to do so.

Answer 9

It promotes them all. A state adopting a religion, or even showing favor to one over others, causes animosity among MOST others. Unforced ideas are more acceptable.

Answer 10

It neither promotes nor penalizes. It allows individuals to decide whether to worship or not, and how to worship (within the laws), based upon their own tastes, beliefs, and consciences.