do you think this is ok...
yesterday my 3yr old wet her pants when we were at the park i didnt have a spare pare of clothes so i just let her play with just a top on and no knicker ors or trousers.
2007-04-10 06:14:37 · 38 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Parenting
excuse me i am shocked that you can say it is child abuse she was happy and i didnt hurt hurt which is abuse usually i have a spare pair or pants at least but i forgot them.
2007-04-10 06:32:23 · update #1
if its not cold i normally do have a spare pair of nickers or when its a little bit chilly i bring a few pairs of tights but today i forgotand most people didnt seem to care but as i was leaving an elderly lady said to me 'you should be ashamed of your self letting your daughter bere her butt to people you dont have the right tobe a mother i was quite affended and just wanted to see what you thought it was a one off and i didnt think any thing of it and it was my friend who said whn i was thinking about going home o why dont you just leave her like that(no trousers or knickers)
2007-04-10 06:45:29 · update #2
it was only for like 10mins before my friends kids who i had shared a lift with had finished eating
2007-04-10 06:51:07 · update #3
We live in a really sad world when people are saying it is not ok for a little girl to run about with no pants on because of paedophiles. She was with her mother, she was safe.
Some of the answers here seem to be saying the mother is pandering to the proclivities of paedophiles - this is like saying that women in short skirts deserve to get raped! It's almost like people are saying she was making her daughter tempting to paedophiles?! Surely it is not the freedom of children that should be curtailed but the freedom of those who would harm them? Also - there are not paedophiles everywhere. Attacks by predatory paedophiles are extremely rare and their frequency has been static for the last decade. Most victims of abuse are abused by someone known to them. Stop scaremongering and let children enjoy some freedom to be children rather than growing up in constant fear.
I think it's fine - let her enjoy her childhood.
Jennanderton.... you are practically insane! Catch an STD or a yeast infection? That's mental (and not possible). Be arrested for public nudity? You ARE joking right? If not I pity your poor children.
2007-04-10 07:29:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I would say that maybe you should've taken her home. Nowadays there are so many people preying on small children you have to be extremely careful. With your child being only three maybe you should always bring an extra pair of clothing for her. Not to say you did anything wrong just be careful of that next time.
2007-04-10 06:25:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well is matters was the shirt long? If it covered at least past her butt it woulda been fine but other than that probley not most people these days are perverts. Next time put a pull-up on her or bring more cloths is my tip :)
2007-04-10 06:27:11 · answer #3 · answered by C 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I probably would have taken her home and gotten some clean clothes, but that is just me. There are too many nut jobs that hang around parks looking at kids. I wouldn't want to open up the opportunity for them to get a thrill off my daughter being naked from the waist down.
2007-04-10 06:19:23 · answer #4 · answered by e_imommy 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
no i do not think that is OK, if it was your yard it would be OK or maybe at a relatives house, but i do not think that is OK at all in a public place, there are a lot of sick people out there why would you give them a free show, when your child said she did not want to go, i read your other question, you should have been the parent and taken her home, who is the boss here? and what about the other parents, you can't know what their beliefs are or push that on them, it's about respect for others, no matter how you feel about there views,
2007-04-10 06:29:03 · answer #5 · answered by melissa s 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I can see why you did it. and it is done now, but I wouldn't do it again. I would just have spare knickers lying round every where, stick a pair in your bag and a pair in the buggy and one in the car. If she had knickers on it wouldn't have mattered at all.
2007-04-10 06:36:49 · answer #6 · answered by dmbz2000 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How dare you allow your child to be naked in public like that? There are pedophiles everywhere and the park is one place they really like to go to so they can see the little kids. You're sick. And if you think abuse is only hurting a child you are very wrong.
You seem like a very immature mother. Why didn't you just go home. That was disgusting.
2007-04-10 06:48:19 · answer #7 · answered by musicpanther67 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think that kids should be able to run around naked but in their own home or a relatives home because you never know who is watching like peados! I would have taken her home to get changed or bought her some new clothes from a nearby shop.
2007-04-10 06:23:40 · answer #8 · answered by angelcakes 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
there was noharm in i if it was a one off and if a pedo is going to look they will look if the kid is naked or not it should be the peedo who is ashamed not you just next time try and bring a pair of knickers
2007-04-10 07:02:20 · answer #9 · answered by kt 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Ummmm Well it is kinda okay but I would bring another pair of clothes nex time cuz God wants us to be dressed.lol.
Especially if freaks r around.
2007-04-10 06:18:45 · answer #10 · answered by Kiana 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋