English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

Depends many causes and many people are worthy enough to die for.

Obviously life is more desirably but in some circumstances death can be more valuable

2007-04-10 04:27:34 · answer #1 · answered by Quantrill 7 · 0 0

Something you live for - assuming you actually do something with it. I mean even if it's trainspotting you live for, if all you ever do is sit around thinking about how nice it could be out there on the platform when there's nothing stopping you from actually doing it, then it's fairly pointless. (I refuse to believe there's any able-bodied tosser so sad all they live for is sitting around thinking about how nice it would be to be out wearing the anorak, so don't even go there!)

So, as I was saying before the spirit of the rail thrust itself in so rudely, it's easy to say "I'd die for x, y or z," but even if push comes to shove, you can only ever possibly be called on to do that once. And despite the best laid plans and all that, there are no guarantees that your death in the name of this cause will do anything more than create some worm food.

I swear if anyone points out that the cause you might be willing to die for is feeding worms I'll have to punch you SO 'ard.

2007-04-10 11:39:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I think they're the same thing. Anything that you live for makes it not worth living without so you would die for it.

2007-04-10 11:41:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Why would you live for something you would not die for?

2007-04-10 11:31:44 · answer #4 · answered by LabGrrl 7 · 0 0

I live for my family, and I would die for them...so some things are the same.

2007-04-10 11:27:18 · answer #5 · answered by photogrl262000 5 · 3 0

something you would die for is more valuable

2007-04-10 11:33:55 · answer #6 · answered by lnfrared Loaf 6 · 0 0

I live for my children, and I would die for them too. Some things are so important as to be worthy of both.

2007-04-10 11:27:09 · answer #7 · answered by iamnoone 7 · 5 0

"Value" to me is relative... I would die for, rather than give up any vows I have taken/will take in this life and I live for quite a bit... so I'd have to say I value everything... even the ugly bits that become my teachers.

_()_

2007-04-10 11:54:03 · answer #8 · answered by vinslave 7 · 0 0

Both are equal. What you live for, surely, you would die for. Or it wouldn't be worth much, would it?

2007-04-10 11:29:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't think you can separate the two.

I would first live for many causes, but would die for them, if necessary.

2007-04-10 11:28:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers