English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

yes , what if it interferes with the the health of the patient or it causes them to die unnecessarily, what about a simple blood transfusion , a doctor has an obligation to help heal a patient and not to interfere with the health of that person because of his or her religious beliefs

2007-04-10 03:21:29 · answer #1 · answered by jim m 7 · 1 0

WOW! that would propose my granddaughter could have already got accepted prepare/wellbeing practitioner certification!!! The previous way, she nonetheless has 2 extra years to pass!!! overlook Obama, i do no longer think of he's the guy who's making numerous those judgements!!! he's what I call the autumn guy! whilst some thing is going incorrect, this administration has to have somebody to blame - and proper now - that's Obama!! this entire ingredient is getting sillier and sillier by skill of the day!!! they only got here up with yet another one! The war Tax at 5%!! a guy or woman? a kinfolk? or what? they choose us to pay for a war we don't choose! basically like this wellbeing Care Plan!!! supply up and picture a minute! we are already taxed for very very nearly each thing we purchase, even utilities! They back choose to develop the taxes we pay on the tip of each twelve months, upload the 5% war tax onto that, and what can we've left to stay to tell the story on!? those adult adult males are nuts!! that's what King Geoge did, taxed the human beings to pay for a war that did no longer earnings any human beings!! Then there are the human beings who merchandise to us flying the yank Flag!!! who're those human beings we voted into workplace? With sixteen million human beings out of artwork already, by skill of the time the working inhabitants has paid numerous those taxes, they too will quickly connect the unemployment strains!!! THEN what's going to this administration do then!? confident, your question is ridiculous yet not extra so than what those adult adult males in DC are doing!!!

2016-10-21 12:42:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It depends upon what you mean by "influence".

I could see a faith oriented doctor being able to access compassion for a patient with a very unlikely positive outcome, and treating them anyway. Or I could see a doctor (every day) feeling haughty and superior, and mistreating patients with a religious justification.

Medicine requires a beleife in rational thought. Faith requires a willingness to abandon rational thought for the sake of magic.

It's too much to ask doctors to always control themselves. I mean, think of WHO becomes a doctor? Usually some geeky egg-head from a privillaged family, who has never lived a life outside of academia. Thats why we need good policies and systems to limit what doctors are allowed to do. The old days of letting doctors be unsupervised are over.

2007-04-10 03:24:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No. It's called freedom of choice and it's one of the principles this country was founded upon.

What they should do is inform potential patients of any religious barriers that may cause problems with care. This way, the patient can make a decision as to whether or not they want to stick with that doctor or seek care from a different one.

A couple of the more common ones are Catholic doctors that have issues with birth control and Mormon doctors that have issues with transfusions of blood products.

Patients should be informed to avoid difficulties.

2007-04-10 03:14:05 · answer #4 · answered by emt_me911 7 · 1 1

Good question. I think that disclaimers should be posted in doctors offices to warn the consumers (patients) of any possible medical omissions they might get subjected to due to religious beliefs.
such as "This medical office is run by a practicing Jehovahs Witness which may mean "No blood Transfusions". What do you think?

2007-04-10 03:19:28 · answer #5 · answered by QuiteNewHere 7 · 1 1

I don't think they need to be banned from practicing, but they need to alert all their patients as to how it would influence their treatment, to allow the patient to choose if the doctor's believes are the same as theirs. Patients always have the choice to choose another dr.

2007-04-10 03:16:42 · answer #6 · answered by ALFimzadi 5 · 1 1

Patients expect doctors to behave in moral and ethical ways. Morals and ethics have their roots in religious beliefs, so it is impossible for a doctor to set aside all religious influence over his or her behaviors.

2007-04-10 03:13:41 · answer #7 · answered by Suzianne 7 · 0 2

every religion is for good and welfare of mankind and humanbeing...if the religion is abused or explained in such a way for personal benifit then it's no longer a "religion"...whoever have done that to whomever...
i guess you have got the answer of your questions..

2007-04-10 03:16:50 · answer #8 · answered by Manik 7 · 0 2

who says that morals based on god (or the perception of god, at least) are any less worthy than human morals? In fact, most of the time they are even better.

2007-04-10 03:32:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

They should be banned. Allowing someone to die just to satisfy your god is just wrong.

2007-04-10 04:28:34 · answer #10 · answered by St. Tom Cruise 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers