English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Should those who consider homosexuality unnatural be banned from all things unatural like clothes, medicine, technology?


After all enhancing your abilities with cars, phones, computers etc is not natural.


All medine or caring for disabled thats not nautral either as in the wild survival of the fittest and all that.

Gods are not part of nautre.

Banking is not.

etc etc

2007-04-10 01:45:09 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

homosexaulity does not deliberately hurt or harm.


Your jesus if he existed and even then was prob human said


do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

= homosexaulity is fine if you kiss other gays as doing unto others...

2007-04-10 02:24:35 · update #1

*************************************************

quote
convince me that being gay is constructive towards a society.



EASY PEASEY


Lets take housing...

gays dont have kids... so mose gays, less kids, more =houseing to go around and everyone gets more land, more food, more resources and better off.


Crime goes down as less competion

Ie thing which is more violent a village or urban ghetto?



Also gays make top best mates for girls.

Lesbians get guys fired up to seek girls.

gasy tend to have great social and creative skills in music, cooking, arts, movies, fashion design etc.

Hows that?


And its a good thing that there are less kids as too many humans on the planet as it is making other life forms extinct and having wars over resources.

2007-04-10 10:30:49 · update #2

ALSO EXPLAIN WHY GAY FRIENDLY AND PORN FRIENDLY SOCIETIES TEND TO BE LESS VIOLENT AND MORE EQUAL?

2007-04-10 10:31:34 · update #3

26 answers

As you rightly point out, moral viewpoints cannot be based on what is or is not 'natural'.

2007-04-10 01:48:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

ok, so all unnatural things should be banned. mmmm....

Humans have been wearing clothes since the biginning of time, literally. so i see that as being natural (by all means u can walk around naked if u want, by i am NOT lol)

I coundlt care less about technonoly, ppl lived before without it, if it all were to be taken away, it might be chaos, but i would not be too botherd.

EVAN ANIMALS IN THE WILD CARE FOR THEIR ELDERLY AND DISABLED, now u say that its not natural....u should watch a bit of the natural history channel, pal! It is true that most of the time it is the elderly and disabled who do not survive, but cummon man, we are human beings, not Kudu! even apes and elephants have been known to help each other.

God is part of nature actuall, ppl have had a eurning for God since time began. Its beacause of God that people see homosexuality as being "unnatural"......i just see it as an abomination. Maybe u should talk to God about this instead of us, and hear what he has to say.

Banking? if we did not have technology we probs whould use trading of goods instead of currency, so we would not need banking.

2007-04-10 02:01:55 · answer #2 · answered by Eryn v 3 · 1 0

I wonder where this question has sprouted from...
But tell me, If it is natural, why do my friends (who consider themseles ugly) suddenly change their sexuality? It's society that influences disgusting behaviour like homosexuality, it does not come naturally. The pressures of today's world screw up the pure minds of vulnerable human that is why we are wondering in darkness. The first people God made were Adam and Eve, I never recalled Adam and Steve. I'm not homophobic but I could never agree it to be natural.

2007-04-10 02:13:26 · answer #3 · answered by Nelly-The-Elephant 2 · 1 0

i understand. Its insane, isn't it? i myself am an atheist, yet I went to a Catholic college in seventh grade and now in severe college. My faith instructor there, a nun, instructed the class that it replaced right into a sin to act on homosexuality because of the fact it "interfered with God's large plan." A pupil asked why if it replaced into against His large plan had He created gay human beings. She spoke back that homosexuality have been created via unique sin alongside with the different "large evils" of the worldwide. Then I asked her if Adam and Eve sinning had made the different animals gay too(I under pressure the be conscious "different", implying that human beings are animals as nicely). I recommended her that 15% of all animals of species that have genders have been in some way involved in the comparable intercourse. She thoroughly ignored my question and instructed me to be certain her after class. i replaced into reprimanded for asking stupid questions that have been disrupting the lesson. yet you're top. each thing approximately faith is hypocrisy, which i understand first hand.

2016-10-28 08:15:20 · answer #4 · answered by fernande 4 · 0 0

No. thats because these unnatural things as u call them have been manipulated/used/invented to supplement mankind- it makes their existence easier.
to put it simply their existence or non existence in ones life can make a huge difference.

Now as for being gay is concerned, what constructive purpose does it serve to mankind ? it brings disease and even questions the longitivity of mankind as it cannot provide us with further offsprings.

convince me that being gay is constructive towards a society.

2007-04-10 05:43:15 · answer #5 · answered by lazrer 3 · 0 0

The sadest thing about our society is the judging, Imagine for a moment what our world would be like if there were no judging, no trying to force our beliefs on others, trying to control, manipulate. Truely choose to share love/fellowship
it is your only hope to find the path of love back to father.

2007-04-10 02:34:35 · answer #6 · answered by happy_kko 4 · 0 0

It would definitely be quite funny if they were but that might be a bit extreme. You're right, there really are few things left anymore that can be considered "natural" but let's face it, some people are just too stupid to grasp this.

2007-04-10 02:07:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no, because that would make us no different to them.

the key is to NOT force our opinions and beliefs on people, to do whats outlined in the question is no different to those people who would deny us the right to "marry" (civil union) our partners.

if they think its unnatural, thats fine, its up to them what to think.. however, if they start dicriminating and acting on these beliefs to force it upon us and disadvantage other people, THEN they are in the wrong.

if they consider it unnatural, ignore them, we can't force things onto them, just as they can't force things onto us.

if they try to tell other people its a sin, or its unnatural, and try to discriminate, then we'll take away everything else that isn't natural, until they are able to accept that other people have different values and beliefs, and that they must tolerate us as part of decent society ( which we are, we're no different apart from a different sexual preference, what are they going to do next? discriminate against people who like peanut butter because its unatural? force us all to have jam?)

2007-04-10 02:01:15 · answer #8 · answered by §ilver 5 · 1 1

Perhaps we should worry not about what others deem to be "unnatural" and instead consider that they may have a point. Is it so unnatural to think that maybe they're right?

2007-04-10 01:56:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What a brilliant question. Someone should bring that to the Master Workers attention, and to all carpenters everywhere.

2007-04-10 02:03:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i hate when people make fun of gays and say its wrong cos its so not i hav friends who r gay bisexual and lesbian and it dont bother me. if sum1 likes sum1 of the same sex why shud it bother any1 its their own decision. yes people who consider it unnatural totaly shud be banned from all that stuff.

2007-04-10 02:00:14 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers