OK you 9/11 "experts"/truth seekers, can you answer me this?

Question

Teams of experts secretly loaded the buildings with explosives to bring down the buildings.

Now let’s assume that this theory is correct…

Here is the question, how did 2 planes loaded to the gills with fuel that slammed in to the side of the buildings and explode NOT cause the buildings to explode immediately?

Now I am not exactly an expert but I grew up in a military family and knew more about weapons and military equipment than baseball and football, so I have a pretty strong understanding of what things do what and how things work.

And I have yet to see one explosive device that could survive an explosion without also being detonated.

Were there just parts that did not have explosives? And if s how did the planes manage to hit those two spots? I mean that’s pretty damn tricky putting a plane exactly in the one spot where there were no explosives…

Any “truth seekers” willing to explain that in a reasonable way?

My guess I will get the same response that I got when I asked about witnesses who conspired to pull off the attack; relative silence or inane drivel.

Yes I know they are irrational. But maybe I can save some one for falling for their mindless drivel.

Information and facts can defeat conspiracies, theoretically... lol

N. cognito: there is one problem with that and that is the physics of the building falling, it is evident the collapse starts at the top and the building goes down ward.

If it is a controlled demolition as the "truth seekers propose each level needs to be prepped for that. Placing it only at the bottom would cause the building to tip over.

Mark: I asked a similar question, the answer.... silence and idiocy.

I never expect logic or intelligence from anyone, makes it easier to deal with people on a daily basis like I do. I once had hope for humanity, now I am just here for the ride. lol

Although I am glad to see most people responding tonight have both =)

Answer 1

Controlled demolitions of buildings (implosions) are not only done with explosives , but tons of steel cables stretched from key points of the building to an interior location to insure that the building collapse inwards. I have always wondered how they managed to do that and not one employee noticed in a place that was open 24/7 with upward of 50 thousand employees. Makes the Ninjas look plain silly. Most Conspiracy theorists are people whose total education and news gathering comes from youtube.

Answer 2

Apparently you know very little about the events of the 9/11 in NYC.
In the video "911: In Plane Site" the method of getting through the exterior support beams is identifiyed as a "flash" that appears a split second before impact on the second plane. The only footage of the first plane crashing into the Tower also shows a similar flash.
The same video goes into a discussion of what appears to be a Pod that was mounted on the bottom of the second plane.
I had read an article that had been written by a Spanish investigative reporter that went into details of the Pod on the bottom of the airplane as it appeared on the cover of a magazine (Newsday or Newsweek). She even went into the physics how one of the engines had been moved slightly to be used as a counter-balance. The article mentioned that she had called Boeing in an attemp tp identify the type of aircraft. Boeing refused to answer on the grounds of national security,
The planes had to be custom built to include a thicker shell that wouldn't have folded up on the side of the building ro insure penetration in addition to the PODs, engine replacement etc. They were not normal passenger airplanes.
There is a press release from September 1998 located in the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey website. The particular released was announcing the first commercial flight landing that was guided by Global Positioning System.
Two weeks later there was another release announcing a "Historic Shift" in the Port Authoritys decision to put the World Trade Center for sale on the open market. It was common knowledge that the Towers were losing millions of dollars every year and were considered "white elephants".

NYC spent millions of dollars converting the 23rd floor of WTC 7, which was a 48 story steel structure that also collapsed on 9/11 at 5:30 in the afternoon, into a Command Center for occasions such as this. Neither of the Official government reports could explain why it collapsed into it's own "footprint" as if it was intentionally controlled demolition. Mr. Silverstein admitted that he had discussed the building with the NYC Fire Departement and that the decision was made to "Pull-it".
You will find his discussion in detail in the video 911: Mysteries - Part 1 Demolitions.

Loose Change 2nd Edition shows "squibbs" and comparisons to other examples of controlled demolitions.
911 Eyewitness was taken from the New Jersey side of the Hudson River. It contains an interview with the then director of FEMA that they were deployed to NYC on 9/10 for a drill but were not permitted access to the site. It also compares the dust clouds from the towers to the Pyroplasmic flows of volcanoes. It also includes evidence of additional explosions both before and after the aircraft.
There are numerous interviews with survivors, first responders, NYC firemen who also experianced additional explosions.

They are available - FREE DOWNLOADS at
http://www.question911.com/linksall.htm

BTW - The then mayor of NY was not permitted to man the Command Center on the 23rd floor of WTC 7 that the taxpayers paid for but he appears in at least one of the videos telling people to move because the building is going to collapse.

I hope I covered almost everything regarding the white elephant land clearance of all of and only the World Trade Center Complex buildings including WTC 7 which had a variety of federal government offices (FBI; CIA; IRS; SEC).

I have done some addition research into this massive insurance fraud that has made multi-billionaires multi-millions of dollars.

Answer 3

Apparently the people who installed the explosive devices were Non-Union Workers who worked at night, week-ends and holidays...without overtime pay. Otherwise the regular workers would have seen them installing the explosives.

There wasn't planes involved in this explosives. What people saw were imaginary pictures projected against the buildings.

Actually, "911" never happened. A large hypnotist machine was set up in New York to hypnotize all the people who were near the two buildings.

After all this foolishness is over, don';t you think it is about time that we got done to accepting the fact that what happened actually happened.

Answer 4

You are exactly right. Also, if you watch the video of the building, you will notice that it begins to fall, and then there is an appearance of an explosion. This is the huge weight of the building causing a pressure that made it look like an explosion. Besides, if it were explosives, everyone would have to agree that the explosion would come first, and then the building would fall, not the other way around.

I'm sure you will get some strange answers here though, but nothing to refute your assertions.

Answer 5

That is just a statistical anomaly due to the small sample size (29) and other sampling errors. Besides there is truth in Numbers it is found in the fourth book in the bible. The truth in Numbers supports the 'Truth in Numbers".

Answer 6

They can't answer that until the conspiracy websites come up with their explanations.

Edit: If explosives were planted at ground level, how would that cause the the WTC to collapse from the rooftop, down?

Answer 7

If there were explosives involved they weren't put there by the government. I would argue though that the apparent lack of knowledge about the whole thing is a little peculiar though.

Answer 8

The conspirators are so insulting to the families of the victims. I wish they would think about that before they open their mouths again.

Free speech comes at a high price; a lot of people take advantage of it using it without thought, knowledge, or respect for those who have earned it for them. We still have to fight for them.

Answer 9

That's new one, but they'll have endless back up arguments. Like, they'll say its super secret gov explosives. Or they planted around impact site. They'll come up with something even more crazy & outrageous untill it turns into intergalatic warfare.

Answer 10

You can't possibly expect logic to work on these moonbats who believe in the 9/11 Conspiracy crapola.