English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-04-09 20:06:37 · 30 answers · asked by thisanth 1 in Sports Cricket

30 answers

too much experimentation....

2007-04-09 20:10:40 · answer #1 · answered by prashant 2 · 0 0

IT"S UNLUCY THAT WORLD BEST BATSMAN
COULDN"T LIVE UP TO HIS MEGA STANDERD>>>UM>>> WHEN NEED MOST>!
But.. Best Answer - Chosen by Asker

It's Sachin's Match ........It was supposed to ...be His world cup & being senior most he should have waited until right moment comes.
Furthermore it was 250 runs to get....
Lankans got it by running between wickets.
Why he went for big booming drive ....Nobody knows..
May be his ego...
Sachin is responsible ...Look what we have got here...
We have solid facts for that.
SL has upper hand...for future games..
Its all the way for Asian Teams
No more white people ruling the Cricket World
But see how they became top of the world right now...
Though they beat india They still had to give their best ever performance..
When Robin Uthappa and Sourav Ganguly walked in, India had a target of just 255 runs, on a wicket which had dried and gone flatter. But nobody showed the determination to stay on, except Dravid. It was his flurry of fours off Malinga in one over that had raised the hopes of Indian fans just for a while.
Anybody can be so sure that ,the turning point was Sachin’s getting out to Fernando, through the gate for a duck. That was a vital blow. India could not recover. The panic button was pressed. Whatever little chances India had went up in flames when Yuvraj was run out foolishly.

It is really worth analysing the difference between the two teams from the sub-continent. India’s strength was batting and given the proper conditions, their medium pacers and the spinners could be devastating. If not, their shoulders start drooping and the bowling goes haywire with all kind of experimentations. It could happen to the batting too.

Exactly opposite are Sri Lanka, except that their batting is as good if not better. We were the big brothers when they started. Now they are the elders. What an irony. They are better fielders for sure, and the bowlers bowl to the field under any circumstances unless it’s a completely off day for them.

Muralitharan is just outstanding. And most importantly, they play as a team and not as individuals. And that’s the thin line that differentiated the two teams. We saw absolutely no regional biases, despite all kinds of problems in their small country.
But they now have to beat only 3 teams to advance easyly to much awaited semi finals.
India could be acontender for the cup,, in 2011.
If they play for their potantial..
hope for the best

2007-04-10 08:13:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The main loss for India in this world Cup is Guru Greg Chapell (as a coach). Indian Cricket needs people like the Guru who can call a spade a spade, pin point the holes in the board, Selection committe and the team, take the politics, economics, history, chemestry etc in and out of the management and selection board by the horns and make the board and team a professional body at par with Australia (maybe even better).

2007-04-10 03:50:46 · answer #3 · answered by sanjay s 1 · 0 0

The match fees for team
but the main loss is THE WORLD CUP for india

2007-04-10 12:48:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Main reason for India's loss in world cup was their attitude towards minnows. If they treated them as any other team, they would not have gone down this way. When it came to Sri Lanka match pressure was too much for them to handle.

2007-04-10 04:21:52 · answer #5 · answered by Kalu 2 · 0 0

The main loss for INDIA in this world cup is their SELF-BELIEF and to prove that the aussies aren't the best

2007-04-10 03:39:47 · answer #6 · answered by Josh 2 · 0 0

Firstly the men in blue were very over confident in their match against Bangladesh and in the rest of the matches the top order collapsed.People like robin uthappa whose highest score was somewhere around 20 ,sachin of course "0" contributed to the loss

2007-04-14 01:29:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

11 Heros Became 11 Zeros...

2007-04-10 09:40:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

main loss is that bloody chapell don't need that our india move ahead. his surname represents him and all indians should beat him through .

2007-04-10 09:55:32 · answer #9 · answered by JASDEEP SINGH K 1 · 0 0

overconfidence and underestimation of the Banglas...even for the crucial match against SL they just played a game that was average.

2007-04-10 07:39:31 · answer #10 · answered by Lamya 6 · 0 0

Sachin Tendulkar got exposed.He failed repeatedly and has started loosing popularity and grounds beneath his feet.

2007-04-10 03:29:24 · answer #11 · answered by Raman 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers