Actually both. I guess what one does stands out more obvious at first, but if you no someone for awhile, the things they don't do, speaks loudly also.
2007-04-09 19:58:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Speedy 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Either one, depending on the situation. Here's a great example! My mom has cancer and only a few months to live. I have a half sister who will call me and ask for money or call me to blame me for every problem in her druggy skank life, but has NEVER called me since our mother has been sick to see how she is doing and has NEVER called our mom to talk to her! Both speak volumes!
2007-04-10 02:57:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Nana of Nana's 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It really depends on the situation. I have actually done both things in different situations. It's a hard one to answer.
2007-04-10 02:56:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would say the things you don't do. Many people may be better than you at whatever it is you don't do, but avoiding vices is a sign of true character.
2007-04-10 03:27:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Things one doesn't do because of the potential of opportunity wasted.
2007-04-10 07:01:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on who is doing the watching.
2007-04-10 02:57:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Details?
2007-04-10 02:58:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mokimberly 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
A bit of the two,But it,s the thing,s that you don't do that tell the story!!
2007-04-10 02:57:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bella 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
both can have equal volume in my book.
2007-04-10 03:09:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Norman 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
what they do.
2007-04-10 02:56:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by RANDELL 7
·
1⤊
0⤋