For not being a professional politician he does a pretty good job representing his country and standing up for it, like any president should.
2007-04-09 23:34:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by fooding 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
He is a lame duck! He will disappear after the next elections in Iran. The religious leaders of Iran now hold all the power, 6 years ago it was not this way. Thought was that the majority of Iranians
were leaning to democratic views. Most being 40 or under they were accepting of a more open and "western" lifestyle. This has now reversed, and the extreme Religious right is in full control once again.
2007-04-09 19:56:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Think 1st 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ahmadienejad is iran's equivalent of George W. Bush
1) A religious fanatic
2) Ignores local Iranain economic problems
3) Loves the military
4) Does things that make no real sense
5) Hates jews as much as George loves jews
6) Powerless, since the Iranian president has no real authority
Correspondingly, George W. Bush is a weak president controlled by a bunch of jewish and protestant extremists known as the NeoConservatives.
It would be nice if both would retire and leave us all alone.
2007-04-09 19:05:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Iranian people are good people and they deserve a better President.
2007-04-09 18:51:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by willow, the yodakitty from hell 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
He easily falls lower back on being waiting to speak his innovations in our united states, yet his countrymen and girls are jailed for talking against their govt. some are even killed over it. And he holds our young women and men in reformatory for mistakenly crossing an invisible border on an analogous time as trekking. Plus he needs to blow Israel off the face of the map. Why can we proceed to enable him come here to voice his opinion against us? Why no longer skype him, if something.
2016-12-15 21:05:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is crazy.... like a fox. A crazy man can be dealt with, as can a greedy man. Unfortunately, I can see that he is really intelligent and knows how to play the game. That makes him even more dangerous.
2007-04-09 18:59:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Kenneth C 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
He's one of the original hostage takers from the 1979 hostage crisis. He's a troll and an idiot. That about does it. Oh, and maybe a moron. And dangerous, to boot, because of his interest in nukes and his hate for America.
2007-04-09 18:49:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by scruffycat 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
He is playing with fire. Does he not realize that if you keep antagonizing other countries they will begin to think you mean the world serious harm and will come to stop you? The sad part is I don't think the citizens of his country have a say about how he behaves right now. Maybe they will do something about him?
2007-04-09 18:51:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by suigeneris-impetus 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
He's a popularist getting caught up in his own rhetoric, blaming others for his people's problems, scapegoating foreign powers and preaching a jingoistic nationalism that....
Wait, was that Mahmoudh Abinedjab or George Bush we were talking about?
2007-04-09 18:51:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by jbtascam 5
·
5⤊
2⤋
I think he is a very dangerous man. To make matters worse, there are religous leaders in Iran who are even more dangerous.
2007-04-09 18:49:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by DBm41 2
·
3⤊
0⤋