2 very close calls for lbw..the first one was definitely out..if simon toefel was the umpire he wud hav given it out. aus got away with it. and it was a very important wicket. ridiculous. australia wud hav been in a lot of trouble..cos gilchrist was also out early
2007-04-09 18:28:03 · 8 answers · asked by kenr3009 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
Don't kid yourself mate and same goes for the others above me,the umpires didn't pay an l.b.w decision the whole game and Gilly clearly wasn't out,and as for Hayden yeah probably was out but it was also very close to pitching out side the line,Australia get no special treatment and with billy (kiwi)bowden umpiring that goes double, its just the way the game goes with umps decisions.
England wouldn't have won anyway with symonds starting to smash them all over the place,and with 2 specialist batsmen to come i.e hussey and hodge, the game was all over when England choked while batting 2/174 and all out for 247 give me a BREAK!!
2007-04-09 20:34:59 · answer #1 · answered by FORKY 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is no point doing post mortum after the match is over. Umpires are human and can error in judgement. Let us admit the fact that the team which played better cricket won.
2007-04-10 18:26:31 · answer #2 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
benefit of the doubt. I feel that with the batting line up te aussies had they would have got the total regardless (ponting, clarke, symonds, hussey)
2007-04-10 01:48:55 · answer #3 · answered by whay i lost my ?s 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yea i no... Hayden was ment to be out... that really annoys me coz england would won... Why is it that Australia get away with everything... If it was like Glenn Mcgrath bowling and it looked like he lbw'd someone they woulda been out... maybe there should be some new umpires...
2007-04-10 02:53:09 · answer #4 · answered by Hot Stuff 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
ya u r right if those decisions were given correctly australia would have come in danger so that wickets were crucial and u have a good opinion for further info contac http://cricketinfo.com
have a nice day!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-04-10 01:35:36 · answer #5 · answered by ri$hi rich$$$ 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes those were close decision both went in favor of australia
2007-04-11 03:21:53 · answer #6 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
best team many a times gets better side of interpretaion as well.
2007-04-10 01:37:05 · answer #7 · answered by KISH 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
even so we still would have won ;)
2007-04-10 01:36:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋