Surely, the Iranians will love her...
On April 10, 2997, an article written by Carla Mariunucci appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle, indicating that Ms. Pelosi and Rep. Lantos are interested in making a "diplomatic trip" to Iran.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/04/10/BAGV9P6C0S6.DTL
Pelosi, Lantos may be interested in diplomatic trip to Iran
Furthermore, the article quoted Rep Lantos as saying that he co-sponsored legislation with Ms. Pelosi which could pass as early as May that calls for making available to all countries --including Iran -- nuclear fuel for peaceful purposes under international oversight by establishing a "nuclear fuel bank".
I believe that the legislation is:
HR 6 Clean Energy Act of 2007
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_bills&docid=f:h6ih.txt.pdf
Those who advocate the "nuclear fuel bank" consider that clean nuclear technology would be available to all countries. However, those who argue against the "nuclear fuel bank" point out that the uranium enrichment process (using centrifuges to separate isotopes as in the FEP at Natanz, Iran) can also be used to produce a more pure grade of uranium 235 which may be used in a nuclear bomb.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4416482.stm
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/09/28/opinion/edbuffett.php
http://www.goodharborreport.com/node/295
The head of the Iranian Nuclear Energy Organization, Gholam-Reza Aghazadeh, explains it thus:
The simple way is to inject 0.7% (uranium) and obtain 3.5%, right? Now, if you take this 3.5% and inject it again into the chain (of centrifuges), the result will be 20%. If you inject the 20% back into the chain, the result will be 60%. If you inject this 60%, the result will be 90%.
http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1120
http://www.memritv.org/Search.asp?ACT=S6&P1=2,148&P3=4
Since Iran has uranium enrichment capabilities at its FEP (fuel enrichment plant) at Natanz, giving Iran nuclear "fuel" enriched to 3.5% might not be a good idea if Iran does have the agenda to develop a nuclear bomb.
The BBC article (listed below) describes the nuclear fuel process.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/sci_nat/05/nuclear_fuel/html/mining.stm
2007-04-11 10:19:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't like her theatrical behavior, but I like the fact that she's a woman, a Democrat and the Speaker of the House.
You know, she's not an LA Woman. She's a San Francisco girl, and the lyrics by Fever Tree fit YOUR feelings more than the ones by the Doors
Out there it's summertime
Milk and honey days
Oh, San Francisco girls with
San Francisco ways
Don't try to stop me girl, you can't have your way
Don't try to stop me girl, nothin' you can say
Live like you wanna live and stay where you wanna stay
I just gotta go and get back to the Bay
So you love me girl, you're just in my way
Don't try to stop me girl, I'm movin' out today
Do what you wanna do and play what you wanna play
I just gotta go and get back to the Bay
2007-04-09 15:44:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Buffy Summers 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Some say I got a bad attitude,
but that don't change the way I feel about you,
and if you think this thought might bring me down,
look again 'cause I ain't wearin' no frown!
and I, get sick when I'm around, I, can't stand to be around, I, hate everything about you!
(not directed at you, Earnest)
2007-04-09 15:30:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by john_stolworthy 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
My eyes! my eyes!
Won't need to much pursuadin'
I don't mean to sound degradin',
But with a face like that you got nothin' to laugh about.
Red lips, hair and fingernails,
I hear you're a mean old jezebel
Lets go up stairs and read my tarot cards
Stay With Me
Rod Stewart and the Small Faces
2007-04-09 15:31:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by bugeyes 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I agree that she's probably a dangerous lefitst lunatic who cares more for party than for country.
Her recent trip to Syria betrays a naivete as well.
2007-04-09 16:56:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by neoimperialistxxi 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
I do not love her madly because I am a girl...
2007-04-09 15:30:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
When I think of San Fran Nan, "mad" comes to mind, but NOT love!
2007-04-09 16:04:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I hate her. I wish she would have swung by Baghdad on her trip to Syria. She's a waste of human flesh. She's lucky that she has the right to be a stupid, feminazi, b*tch. She has no place in politics. She's disgusting.
2007-04-09 15:26:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by SillierKimmie! 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
I'd love it, "As she walking out the Door!" (as in permanently)
2007-04-10 02:49:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Nunya Bidniss 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Like I love a ROOT CANAL!
2007-04-09 15:28:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6
·
2⤊
0⤋