English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-04-09 13:09:48 · 20 answers · asked by aiminhigh24u2 6 in Politics & Government Politics

20 answers

I assume you're referring to Hillary
I don't know but I know it wasn't the same one that Dubya was AWOL from. Or the one that Cheney and Rush got deferments from joining.

2007-04-09 13:15:25 · answer #1 · answered by The Man In The Box 6 · 2 1

Seriously, does it matter anymore if Clinton served, ot whether any of the presidential candidates did serve. Looking at what all those mess and chaos caused in Iran under the command of those in charge, the flawed and poor analytical perceptive McCain, who had served, on what it means by real progress safety and body-guarding safety; and those 6 Brits with their imaginative delusions, it does open our eyes to the fact that service people could be no different from the many walking the common streets, or the many contestants for the American Idol contest - in denial, or being just as flawed and foolish in trying to grab their few minutes of fame.

2007-04-09 20:26:58 · answer #2 · answered by United_Peace 5 · 1 0

The English Army:

Lieutenant General Sir Henry Clinton, GCB, GCH (1771–1829)... son of: General Sir Henry Clinton, KB, (April 16, 1738 – December 23, 1795) was the Commander in Chief of North America...

Oh... this is a political question ? ooops

2007-04-09 20:25:22 · answer #3 · answered by mariner31 7 · 1 0

South West Arkansas #9 Girl Scouts

2007-04-09 20:14:03 · answer #4 · answered by Slow Poke 5 · 1 3

Which Clinton?
Bill accepted a highly distinguished Rhodes Scholarship so he did not get called to serve. Hilary is female so she was not called to serve.
So, uh, was that a tongue-in-cheek question?
Btw, a lot of us folks "serve" our country in many other ways, not just militarily ... do you mean to imply that if somebody does not serve in the armed forces that he or she is any less?

2007-04-09 20:13:34 · answer #5 · answered by americansneedtowakeup 5 · 3 3

I think George Clinton was in the army. And what does this have to do with anything ?

2007-04-09 20:13:59 · answer #6 · answered by Vinegar Taster 7 · 2 1

The same one that Bush is alleged to have served in.

2007-04-09 20:14:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

The only time Clinton ever used a gun was when he was drunk and hunting in Texas....I think he shot a crook in the face too

2007-04-09 20:14:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

The 5th pansy division with the english men in skirts.

2007-04-09 20:53:36 · answer #9 · answered by 1Penguins1 3 · 0 1

Well none but he did volunteer to defend Israel should it ever be attacked. He said that in a speech once. Funny thing though I did not see him on the front lines when they were fighting hezbollah in southern Beirut. I guess he was busy giving speeches in Dubai.

2007-04-09 20:13:49 · answer #10 · answered by Dennis S 3 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers