2007-04-09 12:38:07 · 10 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I'll almost bet that the coward homicide bombers would have placed fewer roadside bombs if Rumsfeld was not in his office.
2007-04-09 12:42:21 · answer #1 · answered by B aka PE 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unlikely. In fact, without Rummie, the administration might have gone with more troops, and more opperations earlier on, leading to higher casualties - possibly it would have been a less unsuccesful war at a higher cost.
2007-04-09 12:48:16 · answer #2 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rumsfeld staying or going doesn't/didn't matter. As long as Bush is President American soldiers are going to continue dying.
2007-04-09 12:49:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it would have made a difference early on. Besides, don't you have to give someone the chance to screw things up first before you criticize them. Of course logic may be absent from your line of thinking. Keep asking questions like this, you make my point everytime. Thanks.
2007-04-09 13:18:30 · answer #4 · answered by Qpid59 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For the 1st time I might agree with you.
2007-04-09 12:43:36 · answer #5 · answered by 1st Buzie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is all par for the course for this Administration.
2007-04-09 13:06:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, that is 100% correct.
2007-04-09 12:41:05 · answer #7 · answered by Al Dave Ismail 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no i doubt it rumsfailed was talkin orders, he was the sacrificial lamb!!
2007-04-09 12:41:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
no you cant blame this on just rummy, soldiers are still dying.
2007-04-09 12:42:27 · answer #9 · answered by sydb1967 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You seem to forget we're at war.
2007-04-09 12:41:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋