It's definitely an interesting read. to be honest i don't know .
I doubt that they would let something as exposing as that be put on the Internet.
But i would n't be surprised, there are certainly many questions that make you worry.
I guess we will never know the answer.
2007-04-09 11:11:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Zaina 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
That site is a spoof, yeah? Because only an idiot would really believe it.
One conspiracy, you could just about believe, but when www.bullshitter.co.uk tells you that everything is a conspiracy from July 7th to my toast landing butter side down when I drop it, then that stretches credibility a tad.
Take some of your tablets and have an early night.
2007-04-09 14:09:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
9/11 was an inside job and the official story for 7/7 is nothing more than a conspiracy theory doesnt add up in one way shape or form . heres a 45 min documentary http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-4943675105275097719&q=police+state well made points out the events of that day and shows the official story for what it is .
Oh and dubya and bliar are nothing more than puppets they personally had nothing to do with the events on either day .
2007-04-09 11:41:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
dude- i am from america- i dont think that bush or blair or the governments would ever conspire such attacks. peopel here say that 9/11 was a conspiracy. bush or blair had nothing to do with it. first of all- they get asked billions of questions of whether or not they had anything to do with it. they answers all of those questions with out giving any proof of their involvement. usually if they are apart of it- they slip something out- neither of them did anything. they arent conspiracies- either of them. first of all- in 9/11- it was said that the towers were attacked to boost the economy. attacking the economy capital of the world makes no sense at all. they would never do such things- people are always looking for reasons to challange their government no matter where they go. i read the article- you can easilt tell it is not a good source. there is no actual proof- just what they say.
2007-04-09 11:09:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by a cool person 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
i don't think of there is something anybody can say which could change what occurred and how they sense... yet i could say that i'm sorry and that no longer all muslims are "terrorists". i'm a muslim and that i do no longer trust that killing harmless human beings receives anybody everywhere.. then back, there are one of those different international locations and massive powers to blame of the very similar.... Islam is a faith of peace, and before anybody says yeah correct... take a second to verify the quran in its entirety. Its all in there... in simple terms some human beings imagine that its their correct to curl the words of GOD to larger wholesome their personal needs....
2016-11-27 23:21:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Often intelligence operatives are highly politically opinionated, and have training and secrecy capable of creating such a circumstance. Would they have an agenda that such an action would justify - hmmm.. YES.
I just hope they didn't because I'd actually like to trust them
2007-04-09 11:22:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I dont think the story is true. More sensational than true. And the above does not have to use such language,
2007-04-09 13:06:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by K. Marx iii 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The conspiracy lies in the mind of the beholder!Be careful,you never know when you're being watched.
2007-04-09 11:16:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by pan 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
Here we go, another conspiracy theory.....
How many is that???
But hey we live in a democracy where even the crazy people are allowed to have an opinion, how lucky we are...
2007-04-09 11:30:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by losing the plot!!! 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
when i play chess i give some sacrifices as trap to have the best chance to hit My enemy in perfect way.but that does`t mean 100% they did it.
2007-04-09 11:38:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by wael b 2
·
1⤊
0⤋