English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-04-09 10:19:12 · 31 answers · asked by stepped on the Third Rail 2 in Politics & Government Politics

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/index.html#Attacks

2007-04-09 10:23:40 · update #1

Just see the list people....Tim Mcveah and two or three others 10 years ago don't add up to anything the religion of peace is doing these days.

2007-04-09 10:29:20 · update #2

31 answers

ISLAM/SHARIA LAW/ The Koran,
These things alone create violent abuse in their nations, which in turn create hatred, and terror that changes human body chemicals that do INFECT and change THE BRAIN<<< TERROR CHANGES THE CHEMICALS OF YOUR BRAIN< BODY< MIND< ETC>>>
Its like 30xthe power of grown people that get ptsd. They live this way from BIRTH, which changes them into NON civilised, humans, ESPECIALLY IF THEY ARE POOR !

those are the reasons why, and they recruit people who are willing to go along, or death threat them into playing along !

2007-04-09 10:23:11 · answer #1 · answered by fivefootnuttinhuny 3 · 2 4

There are a lot of terrorized brits who'd point out that there have been more than a few Irish terrorists. And, the Spanish are still dealing with ETA (basque, not muslim). Even those trying to establish Israel as a state resorted to terrorist tactics for a time.

And, if you're an American, you might have noticed a few home-grown terrorists. A certain building in Oaklahoma getting blown up, for instance, not to mention attacks on abortion doctors and, from the other side of the political fence, animal testing labs. Those acts were meant to terrorize people in order to advance a cause.

I'd be more concerned with the idea that taking any action to defend against muslim terrorists "only creates more terrorists" - that'd imply that, though everry Muslim isn't a terrorist, every Muslim may be a /potential/ terrorist, which is just as bad, in a way.


In answer to the follow-up: regardless of how many /more/ terrorist acts may have been committed by Muslims lately, it's just factually incorrect to state that "EVERY" terrorist is a Muslim. You might want to go with something more like "why are so many terrorists muslims?"

There are a lot of muslims living in disadvantaged countries (or 'failed states' depending on how you look at it), in conditions that breed dispair and hostility. Terrorism is an act of desperation, and there are a lot more desperate Muslims than desperate anti-abortion or animal-rights advocates. That could be part of an explanation for the prevelance of muslims among perpetrators of terrorist acts.

2007-04-09 17:28:53 · answer #2 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 5 1

Syllogisms.
In the times of Socrates there were schools on how to manipulate information. Follow this thoughts.

Anything I did not lost
I must have,
I did not lost horns
then I have horns

If the first premise APPEARS to be correct, this does not mean that the conclusion is correct.
Now check this out and draw your own conclusion about the validity of the premise.

All man are mortal
Socrates is a man
then Socrates is mortal

Now Analise two opposite statements and there conclusions.

Not all Muslims are t.......t
then some of them are t.......t
(Not all of them, because it contradicts the premises}

All t.......t are Muslim
Carlitos is a t.......t
then Carlitos is a Muslim
(The premises is false, then the conclusion is false)

2007-04-09 17:49:53 · answer #3 · answered by Jorge T 3 · 0 0

Maybe you meant to say "every jihadist is a muslim". That would be a true statement. The muslims who are not terrorists simply do not fully practice their religion, which is a good thing for civilization. Those who claim that Islam is
"the religion of peace" are simply being politically correct or are simply ignorant of the contents of the koran. Mohammed, the "prophet", an acknowledged pedophile (one of his wifes was eight when he consummated their "marriage"), worshipped allah, the "moon god". It's a religeon, but a false one.

2007-04-09 17:35:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

A better way to phrase it is:

"MOST TERRORISTS ARE MUSLIM, BUT MOST MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS--EVEN THOUGH MOST MUSLIMS DO SUPPORT TERRORISM AS A TACTIC."

The reasons for this are because of the inherently violent and craven nature of Islam, which was started by the mass-murdering used-goat-salesman, Mohammed.

Their culture is atavistic and illiterate, and completely intolerant of other points of view. Blowing themselves and others up in markets and kindergartens, sawing others' heads off with a dirty knife, and hijacking airplanes are their approach to problem solving.

What a bunch of losers. And liberals always love losers!

Also--for those who fail to research their answers--Tim McVeigh and Terry Nichols had plenty of help from Iraqi agents, and Nichols even met in the Phillipines with Ramsi Yusef, the sheik behind the first WTC bombing in '93.

2007-04-09 17:31:41 · answer #5 · answered by Donald J 1 · 3 0

This is only true in the Middle east. You have to consider the IRA, the Basque Separatists, just to mention a few. You can dig and find terrorists in just about anything and everything and every country. We have had our own home grown ones here, blowing up and burning Abortion Clinics, the environmentalists destroying logging equipment and putting spikes in trees.

Just look around and you will find, Muslim's don't hold the patent on terrorism, they happen to big the biggest game in town right now.

2007-04-09 17:26:18 · answer #6 · answered by bigmikejones 5 · 2 1

You are making an assumption that every terrorist is a Muslim, was Timothy McVeigh a Muslim?

2007-04-09 17:25:52 · answer #7 · answered by furrryyy 5 · 4 0

KKK, IRA ,ITA ,Amish, Castro, Hitler,stalin , lenin,hagana, Zonists, Bloody marry , and then again Marxism and communism were not founded by muslims......these are not muslims.........as a matter of fact !!

And what do you call a terrorist? The one who kill innocents Right?? 50,00,000 innocent Iraqi and Afghanis are being killed during past few years ... just for the sake of power and money !! Ahh but yes this kind of terrorism is wrapped in the cover of legal terminology "war" !

"Accuse the victims" is Cool huh??

Terrorism is some one's personal act , not religious........!they are equaly hateful whether they are muslims or belong to any other religion....I guess some tolerance to other religions can make this world beautiful !

2007-04-09 17:38:38 · answer #8 · answered by ★Roshni★ 6 · 1 2

Ted Kacynski, Timothy McVeigh, Terry Nichols, Eric Rudolph, the KKK, Aryan Nation, Bull Connor, the list goes on. All of white european descent, all raised in some form of Christianity.

2007-04-09 17:27:22 · answer #9 · answered by Studbolt Slickrock Deux 4 · 3 2

That's a good one. Of course it's not totally true. McVeigh wasn't a Muslim but he was working with the Muslims and the IRA aren't Muslims but they haven't been doing much in the past 5 years.

As of today, you are correct. All terrorists are Muslim.

2007-04-09 17:26:46 · answer #10 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 1 3

You are wrong. Those that blow up abortion clinics are not Muslim but are terrorist. Tim McVeigh was not a Muslim yet he was a terrorist.

A better statement would be: "Not every conservative is a terrorist, but every terrorist is a conservative.

Thanks for opening the door.

2007-04-09 17:23:06 · answer #11 · answered by cheri b 5 · 5 4

fedest.com, questions and answers