2007-04-09 09:52:32 · 15 answers · asked by Dia 3 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
When and where did the moon land? What the hell are you saying? Confused? I say it's fake because the moon doesn't land, it's in orbit in space.
2007-04-09 10:01:41 · answer #1 · answered by Parercut Faint 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
None. All of the "facts" pointed out in moon landing hoax theories are tenuous at best. There is direct, verifiable evidence that the moon landings were real, because of the corner cube retroreflectors on the moon, and because of the moon rocks that have been brought back (the likes of which do not exist on earth).
2007-04-09 17:01:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
None. There are no "facts" that cannot be debunked in a heartbeat. One popular "fact" is the absence of stars in all the pictures. Must be because the whole thing was shot in a studio. Right? Nope just hard to take pictures of stars in an environment where the sunlight is twice as bright as it is on earth. And still:
http://www.solarviews.com/raw/apo/as11_40_5874.jpg
Give it up already. The lunarlandings were real. Not even the sovietunion disputed that fact.
2007-04-09 17:07:34 · answer #3 · answered by DrAnders_pHd 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Watch the videos and use phisics and logic to find the truth.
Like the flag for example, it's stiff maybe because of wire reinforcement, but solar winds would make a flag wave, and if nasa knew this they would'nt need to wire reinforce it anyways.
Also watch the video of the moon buggy, fine moon dust is kicked back and upwards, so why does it fall back down sooner than it's suppose to, since no gravity prevales, this fine moon dust should of been flooting almost indefinately for a longer time then the one in the film.
Also since the moon is fixed pointed to the earth, there should'nt be any earth risings or earth settings if your looking at it from the moons surface.
This is just one of many conspiracy theories.
2007-04-09 18:38:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Clearly since the Flat Earth Society started the story to discount photos of a round earth, it must be true. After all, I trust them way above NASA and the entire scientific community. Have you joined them yet ?
2007-04-09 17:15:55 · answer #5 · answered by Gene 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are no "facts" that can suggest that, but there are plenty of ideas, suppositions, and theories that do. "Facts" can only suggest the truth, and since there is no truth to the idea of a fake moon landing, there can be no "facts" that suggest it.
2007-04-09 17:00:51 · answer #6 · answered by cynicusprime 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Like the other poster mentioned, there are no facts. But there are many hypotheses and hypotheses about inconsistencies and circumstantial events that add up to introducing doubt about the landing. To me, the landing itself is not a fact either. My opinion now tends to believe it was a hoax. Search google videos and the web in general to get an idea about all the arguments for believing it was a hoax.
2007-04-09 17:05:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
With respect to the answer about the flag, good try but NASA knew that the flag couldn't wave and provided wire reinforcements to hold it out for the photo.
2007-04-09 17:31:30 · answer #8 · answered by Michael M 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are images of the flag waving as if in the wind (which is impossible as the moon has no atmosphere and is enveloped in a vaccuum, so there is no air). To disestablish this theory, some believe that it was static from the space suits which caused the flag to move.
2007-04-09 17:01:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I'd have to hear Harrison Schmitt recant. Somehow, I don't think that's going to happen (because he really did go to the moon!). If he did recant, he'd get barred from the scientific community.
2007-04-09 17:14:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋