Do you support the BCCI's decision to put heavy restrictions on cricketers?

Question

1. Cricketers can't endorse more than 3 brands.
2. A single sponsorer can't sign more than two cricketers.
3. No player other than the captain can talk to the media.
4. Show cause notice to Sachin.
5. Cricketers have to produce the copy of their commercial contracts to BCCI.
6. Reduction of match fee
................and so on.

It infurates me when those people who have never held a bat in their hands in their entire life, sit on the high profile chairs inside AC room and attempts to put chain around the necks of the players who are actually shedding toil 'n tear at the ground out there. Before imposing sanctions on players, the BCCI managers should look into their own faults.

Answer 1

Of course...they deserved every bit of it !!

Answer 2

While I think that the restrictions on endorsement is slightly controversial and uncalled for mainly because the players will get endorsement if they are popular only and for being popular they have to excell in their game, I do not find anything wrong in other restrictions imposed by the BCCI. These are not the decisions taken by the people who are ignorant about cricket, but these decisions have been based on the suggestions given by ex-cricketers and captains.

Answer 3

If the players were shedding toll'n tear there in the middle of the ground then BCCI will not impose these sanctions. I think its a great decision taken by the BCCI and cricketers will,now, come to know what their actual profession is and how they can be sincere with their profession. You talk about their hard work in the ground and forget how the belied the hopes of a billion people who even spend their food money to see them in action, who prayed for them day and night and who worshiped them like God.

Answer 4

Yes, it is necessary to save cricket in India. Recently players became careless & were not bothered much about the game as they were getting heavy money easily irrespective of performances. When they do not deliver , some hard decisions were overdue to force them to deliver or get eliminated particularly old limping or dead horses like Tendulkar, Savrav, Dravid, Laxman, Agarkar, Zaheer & Kumble. No player should take BCCI for granted, that must be the signal.

Answer 5

stable i think of TOI summed it up fantastically : " it incredibly is extra handy to thieve gold from fortress Knox than to triumph over Australia in Perth." Australian economic business enterprise have been robbed off. it is the reason it grow to be reported that this was once a chain between the cricket's undoubted champions and their celebrated challengers. although what India has achieved right here is basically mind-boggling. That too beacause of what all occurred the previous week. properly it incredibly is going to be an absolute mayhem in Oval. Hail the guy- Anil Kumble for the steely resolve and showing the variety of advantageous character. astonishing guy to lead the rustic in such confusing events.

Answer 6

I agree with you on some areas. I agree that the board should not be made of people who never played cricket in their lives. Instead, it should be made up of a panel of former cricketers, so that they know exactly how to solve these problem through their expertise. However, these restrictions appear necessary in order for the Indian players to progress.

Answer 7

Yes.I agree with the BCCI's decision
If this steps are taken before announcing the world cup scord it will be more effective.It is must at present situation .I feel this present critical suituation demand them to perform well for themselves.

Answer 8

This one is immediate response of BCCI to team India failure.They have dumped burden on players.In the long run it is not going to last

Answer 9

I think their decision is absolutely correct.The cricketers should have some restrictions so that they perform well in the matches.

Answer 10

these r good decisions