English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

What? Whose imperial policy are you talking about? Certainly not the US. Since World War I, what imperial designs has America had? None. And since Kissinger was prominent some 60 years after World War I, it stands to reason he had no hand in implementing any imperial policy.

The only territorial gains the US has had lately is land in which to bury the dead of those who died trying to save Europe in both World Wars.

You want a pioneer in the implementation of imperialistic policy, look at Joseph Stalin and how he gobbled up Eastern Europe.

This is like the question, "Have you quit beating your spouse?". You have started out with a false premise and are trying to get us to assume it is try. Nice try. So sorry it won't work this time.

2007-04-09 07:50:39 · answer #1 · answered by Kevin C 4 · 2 0

Of course NOT. He was NOT an advocate of Imperialism but rather of Detente, a policy of getting along with adversaries by communicating and not angering them unnecessarily. He was Nixon's Secretary of State, hardly an imperialist, no more than Nixon was. Read your history!!

Chow!!

2007-04-09 08:34:06 · answer #2 · answered by No one 7 · 0 0

kissinger was merely a lackey of the rockefeller organization!!after his "abyssmal loss of the presidential election to john f. kennedy;richard nixon had been cajoled into running for california's governorship by rockefeller concerns who promised to "bankroll" the effort!!but the rockefellers paid the financial fees of his opponent also to make sure that he would lose and would have to fall ,broken and in debt into their waiting hands!!he was then brought into the rockefellers law firm on salary under john mitchell at a salary of $125,000 a year!!in no time at all,though ;he had developed a "war chest" of 2 and 1/2 million dollars to run for the presidency under the aegis and the "benevolent" tutelage of the rockefellers and promising to end the war with honor and victory!!a war that was "so profitable to the rockefeller munitions and uniform manufacturing concerns because they were supplying both sides of the conflict in vietnam with weapons,uniforms,ammunition and logistical support;so a "go slow" tactic allowed the rockefellers to squeeze the last little bit of profit out of the vietnam conflict and yet to gain control of the office of the presidency for generations to come!!!john mitchell later became richard nixon's attorney general and kissinger floated back into the rockefeller foundations when everyone was impeached,indicted or imprisoned in the administration that he had cynically helped establish for his "overlords" the rockefellers!!

2007-04-09 07:56:00 · answer #3 · answered by eldoradoreefgold 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers