Simply put, homosexuality is currently a prime political theme. For a ***** to have aides, it is a travesty and merits public concern, but for a normal, tax paying, heterosexual to be stricken with this dread affliction, it is a matter of perversity.
2007-04-09 10:10:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
This is an opinion not a set of facts. So Who is choosing to label this a Liberal stance? Is someone seeking to slag the Liberal Party as they might have the best chance of forming the next Liberal Government? If this question was written by a former Alliance, former Reform, then this is clearly a question designed to cause dissent. I need to be clear here, I am not a member of the Liberal Party. I do not normally vote for the Liberal Party. So being homosexual is natural. Our reaction to homosexuality where we might make it as being bad and wrong is not natural. Regarding Gender - some people are the wrong gender and we need to support them in making the gender reversal.
2007-04-09 06:49:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Brian M 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because SOME liberals are homosexual and some are sympathizers and they dont want to give up the status they have gained already, a status that in my opinion is sorrily misinterpreted. Homosexuality occurs even in animals but if it were the norm all animals would be doing IT(if you know what I mean)
2007-04-09 08:19:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by walter m 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
For some reason i do no longer think of there's a written regulation that proclaims Liberals have faith gender roles are man made. extra liberal-minded human beings reconigze that the region of females has evovled to mirror the substitute of todays society. Conservatives have the screwed up ideology of their sexist parentage that females are aspects and don't deserve the comparable treatment decrease than the regulation and interior the region of work. As for homosexuality being organic ....i do no longer understand any semi-sensible guy or woman who could argue its "organic" the difficulty and the question is, is homosexuality IMMORAL? although you experience approximately homosexuality you are able to desire to ask your self do you have the terrific to guard the "sancity" of hetrosexual marriage against gay marriage. while 50% of u . s .'s "sacred unions" lead to divorce. "You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your guy or woman eye, after which you will see needless to say to get rid of the speck out of your brother's eye." -Matthew 7:5
2016-12-08 22:20:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some people are incapable of using logic. These people typically base their decisions on emotion, and therefore never realize the contradictory nature of their beliefs. The liberals that you speak of fall into this category.
2007-04-09 06:51:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well, every scientific study has agreed that people are born gay. It is part of the human condition. Why would anyone choose to live the gay lifestyle voluntarily? Who choose to live a lifestyle where you are discriminated against by most of society? That's not a choice, it's the way they were born.
I notice a lot of the harassment is directed towards gay men and not so much gay women which leads me to believe most anti-gay people, just don't like the way it looks. So instead of kindly keeping your mouth shut like you would if you saw something unpleasant(in your opinion), these people claim that gays are evil and immoral. It's sad so many people in our society will write someone off based on who they're sexually attracted to. Pathetic.
2007-04-09 07:52:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
People who use the word "some" in their generalizations realize that they are referring to a small minority, but the word "some" conveys a kind of consensus that does not exist.
2007-04-09 06:37:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'll do my best at answering. Liberals are whacked? They don't know right from wrong, and will say or do anything that meets their agenda for the time being whether or not it makes sense? They don't make sense, especially not in the common sense area.
2007-04-09 06:54:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by xenypoo 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Why don't you ask MarkFoley, Mary Cheny, and Ted Haggard?
2007-04-09 07:45:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is no good answer for that question. Well, at least one that libs will like.
2007-04-09 06:44:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋