So if that's so will all the Libs do their part to help save the Earth by holding their breath for the rest of their lives,after all you exhale carbon dioxide. You are killing the Earth every time you exhale,don't you understand that? Don't you care??
2007-04-09 04:30:04 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes, and humans are responsible for approximately 4% of it. Mt. St. Helen's is more detrimental to the atmosphere than modern civilization. The earth has undergone weather and climate change for billions of years. Humans and modern civilzation simple hasn't been around long enough to contibute to it. Even those full of hot-air! I get your humor, though!
2007-04-09 05:08:21 · answer #1 · answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Logic or facts Long Dong? Ohhhhh, you mean like the FACT that it was warmer during the MWP than it is today, evidenced by tree lines 300 feet higher around the world, by the Vikings farming with simple hand tools parts of Greenland that are not arable today with John Deere tractors, by England being wine country, by fig and olive trees growing in Germany, by the plains buffalo migrating 500 miles to the north, by a great drought in what is now the US Southwest, similar to what is predicted with another 2-3 degrees C of warming over the next 50 years? You mean like THOSE facts? And the fact that at the time, atmospheric CO2 levels were LOWER than today? You mean LOGIC, which says that if it was warmer when CO2 levels were lower, then while CO2 is a factor, something else must be the driving factor?
Is THAT what you mean?
2007-04-09 05:03:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
no. water vapour interior the air is to blame! in case you examine graphs of world temperature: carbon dioxide ranges you will see that the temperature will enhance previously the carbon dioxide!!! that's via the temperature of the sea and the plant life interior of it. carbon dioxide isn't inflicting international warming, in certainty we human beings have have been given no longer something to do with international warming! and for people who disagree with me you may desire to examine extra and hear those that truly understand what they are talking approximately, the international is truly getting cooler by skill of a few stages over the previous few years, how does al gore clarify that?
2016-10-21 10:37:30 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
C0 admitted from the burning fossil fuel is what the scientist and the EPA are talking about. I work at a power plant that burns coal to make steam and drive steam driven turbines to make power. The EPA is concerned in this MASSIVE amount of C0 that is created when these fossil fuels are burnt. I don't think breathing by either political party is of great concern to the EPA.
2007-04-09 04:38:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
breathing/volcanoes/animals.. all part of the natural cycle.. SUV's/Factories.. not so much... green house gasses are one part of global warming.. and we are tipping that scale very quickly by adding to the amount of gas being produced while at the same time cutting down swaths of the rain forests.. some people like to say that more CO2 means more plants.. well maybe if we didn't cut them down faster than they can catch up.
2007-04-09 04:52:51 · answer #5 · answered by pip 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Methane is a larger contributor than CO2. Therefore, I ask everyone on Y!A to quit spewwing schit out of their mouths.
2007-04-09 04:34:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
...except for the part about CO2 causing plants and trees and flowers to grow. They still need to work that one out.
2007-04-09 04:33:40 · answer #7 · answered by rustyshackleford001 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
That's what we really need to do right? Poppulation Control. Naturally we'll have to start with people who took worthless majors in college like Liberal arts...
2007-04-09 04:35:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
muppet
2007-04-09 04:34:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋