Telepathy does it realy exist. and can it be possible scientifically.?

Answer 1

Telepathy can indeed be explained by science. Whatever message is to be transmitted occurs in the form of electrochemical signals in the brain.(- See model of brain and its functions with 'neurones' and 'synapses' as key words) As you may know, as those signals move or travel, they actually generate fields. In cases of intensive mental activities, those fields generated can be strong enough to interact with the brain of other people and send the same message to their brains too. Some people are able to exert a control over this power and actually prevent their brain from generating field that are too powerful. On the other hand, you can master the skill of communicating through brainwaves by meditation.

Answer 2

Yes, I believe it does exist, and it's been explained to my satisfaction. Just because something hasn't been been scientifically explained at this point, doesn't mean it's inexplicable!

*Telepathy is only paranormal if we define 'normal' the theory that the mind is confined to the brain.

Mental sensitivity and what people commonly refer to as 'the sixth sense' have been seen in the animal kingdom for centuries, and have been reported by people experiencing 'phenomena' as well. I believe it's biological.

:D

Answer 3

yes it does, but it's not as strong as you think it would be - you can't read someone's thought word-for-word it's just not possible. i read once that some scientists/psychologists did a few tests on some people who suspect they may be telepathic, and the result came back as unknown but there is an extremely high possibility of someone having telepathy at its lowest/most basic level

Answer 4

earlier an answer would nicely take delivery of, technological information would elect frustrating data to judge. As compelling as everybody would nicely be, we received't settle for anecdotal data, photographic data, or video recordings as frustrating data, because they're unreliable and extremely falsifiable. There are more suitable issues we do not comprehend than we do comprehend, so one might want to keep an open concepts, yet we'd want to continually no longer let our minds run away with ourselves. in case you elect an answer with any authority, you would opt to have data which may be quantifiable and examined lower than life like laboratory situations, which phenomenon jointly with those aren't any more extremely testable. earlier you call me a hater or a troll or what have you ever, you should comprehend that I truthfully have had my justifiable percentage of unusual encounters. at the same time as i became a baby, I heard footsteps and the door of my bedroom open, and the radio grew to change into on; the in problem-free words issue became that i became 1/2 asleep at the same time as it befell, so it would want to have extremely were my mind's eye mixed with an effortless electric powered prevalence. i have also taken a photo of what many would call a "ghost", or perhaps with the actual shown reality that it wasn't hoaxed, it would not instruct one aspect or yet another (proving it wasn't cigarette smoke does no longer instruct that's data of the magical). for my area, i imagine that it would nicely be obtainable, yet that it is not probable; and, even with if ghosts DID exist, it does no longer be supernatural, yet in problem-free words a organic prevalence that we had earlier understood (and if so, it likely probable is only no longer data of the afterlife, or that the phenomenon has any intelligence in the back of it). Ghosts have a "habit" of being to blame for issues we've a frustrating time explaining, or locate understanding, jointly with a baby being fearful of a few thing or a dogs barking for no glaring reason (a lot the same way the ancients used to characteristic organic occurrences to deities). that's your effortless argument from lack of data. i'd argue that you brush off the proposition fullyyt till newbie "investigators" arise with more suitable actual, testable data; yet, in case you may want to keep believing, i'd urge you to examine each case you're provided carefully, continually asking skeptical questions and attempt to disprove the declare. wish this helped.

Answer 5

It only exists in the minds of people who wants to believe in it. Scientifically, it does not exist unless the scientist in question is hallucinating!!!

If you believe in all this nonsense then you might as well start practising black magic and/or African witchcraft!!

Answer 6

i would never have believed it possible and certainly not by trying but once a friend of mine in new zealand who was going through a tough part of her life shocked me when i told her this....i said to her that last night i was drifting off to sleep at about 1.00 am and it seemed like someone grabbed me by the leg and pulled me clean out of bed onto floor when actually i was still laid there .....when i told her the time and it being 12 hours ahead of UK at that time she said OMG at that time i took the kids back to school at dinner time and i got a flat tyre,she said i just broke down crying and gripped the steering wheel really hard and shouted........I WISH FOX WAS HERE..HE WOULD BE ABLE TO HELP ME......... phew,maybe nothing to do with it but what do you think? sure seemed so...will never know and by the way...her life changed totally for the good these days

Answer 7

Many things are only impossible till someone does them or the science catches up with the imagination.

Answer 8

I have never heard of a valid scientific test that supported it as being anything more than a parlor game.

Answer 9

Yes, and already in action with the telecommunication industry. With the internet you can also transmit video.

Answer 10

No. If it were possible, people would be doing it frequently.
An occasional "claim" that it works is pointless and identifies flawed science.