2007-04-09 03:25:31 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Ms. Pelosi is proving to be a liability to the democratic party. I should not be surprised if she is replaced as Speaker of the House in short order. She is not playing well in the rest of America. Once democrats sense that she is a dangerous to their quest for power they will turn on her like a pack of wild dogs.
.
2007-04-09 03:41:02 · answer #1 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Nancy Pelosi is the epitome of what the Democrat leaders are. She is a silly fool it incredibly is a few distance over her head, First she denies the life of a conflict in Iraq, and then she travels to a terrorist helping united states and rewards the ruler with a "State" visit from the US. What a thoroughly stupid element to do. Do you liberals available understand the way lots your elected Democrat leaders have harmed the conflict attempt, and the distant places coverage of this united states with their consistent whining in regards to the President and each thing he does? The conflict in Iraq could have probably been over through now if the enemy wasn't rooting for the democrats to hold down the President.
2016-12-08 22:13:33 · answer #2 · answered by cavallo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont know. Why has Bush done the same for years with Saudi Arabia-when they have been a terrorist stronghold for decades and not only that-but 17 of the 19 911 hijackers were from Saudi.
2007-04-09 03:41:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
I think it is a very good move she is doing... too bad some people are too narrow-minded (amongst other things) to see it. About time somebody did something different. Stupid bush has not seen how isolating these countries makes it more difficult for peaceful relations. I say good on her. Shows some hope- maybe people can get along with a bit of understanding.
2007-04-09 05:18:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Telling the Syrians to stop supporting Hezbolla and telling Saudi Arabia to give rights to women is hardly catering to them. Violence is the language of the unheard, and it is nice to give them a pathway for a dialog. It is much better than calling people evil and refusing to speak to them.
2007-04-09 03:28:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
It could be that her political power is going to her head.
2007-04-09 16:07:24 · answer #6 · answered by Goldenrain 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Its political instead of for the good of the region.
2007-04-09 05:00:37 · answer #7 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because she's a ******* idiot who cares more about scoring political points than she does about the country.
2007-04-09 03:29:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Why are you posing a question as if it were factual?
Pretty irresponsible, I'd say.
I'm glad someone is trying diplomacy. What's the old expression "keep your friends close and your enemies closer."
2007-04-09 04:39:18 · answer #9 · answered by Jackie Oh! 7 · 0⤊ 5⤋
She is an example of liberal Democrats. The rules are for everyone but them.
2007-04-09 04:14:02 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋