I sympathize for her concerning the loss of her son, but when I saw her and some other idiots delivering easter goodies to the Bush Texas ranch, I have come to the realization that she is being used by liberals.
2007-04-09 03:04:33 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
you are correct
2007-04-09 03:09:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Cindy Sheehan is a smart promoter who's gaining exposure and money from her son's loss of life. She does not understand up from down yet she is being cautioned via people who're anti-Bush and specific anti-united statesa. and she or he's profiting from it. she will ultimately take her money and run and not in any respect be heard of returned. it fairly is an occasion the place freedom of speech is risky.
2016-10-28 06:18:00 · answer #2 · answered by aldin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
These libs would have you believe that Cindy Sheehan is a caring mother who lost her son in an unjust war and that she' grieving over that loss, which couldn't be farther from the truth.
There's plenty of documentation out there that she couldn't have cared less about Casey when he was alive and is using his death as a rallying point. Everyone who knew Casey said he firmly believed in the cause he was fighting for and I think that she's exploiting his death for all she can milk out of it.
To make matters worse, she' gone beyond the war. She's cozying up with every two-bit crackpot in the world as long as they are anti-American. Did you not see that picture of her hugging up to Chavez?
Cindy Sheehan has already received way more attention than she's entitled to and it'll only be a matter of time before she finally steps across the line and descends into lunacy.
2007-04-09 03:13:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
People make their own choices. Many parents of dead soldiers are very angry and now opposed to this war. They believed Bush and put themselves behind him in the lead up to Iraq. Now they are seeing that the justification for the war was a lie, that there were no WMDs, and that people like Donald Rumsfeld mismanaged it so poorly that their children's lives were lost in vain.
Wouldn't you be angry if you realized this.
She is not a pawn. America was a pawn, when they were frightened into throwing their faith in with a President who hijacked public fear after 9/11.
2007-04-09 03:42:10 · answer #4 · answered by rockin 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
That is the move of the leaders in the Liberal wing they do use victims, especially ones that will go off the deep end like she has to push their radical agenda. Just read about her before this happened to her son and even just after it she definitly is doing this for other purposes not for the honor of her son.
2007-04-09 03:18:26 · answer #5 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I would be ashamed of my mother if she acted like that.
She was most likely mad at her son for joining and going to war. HE dies, she didn't want to be mad at her son so she blamed President Bush. She displaced her anger. She was vocal about it and libs picked tha tup and have been parading her around.
I read a story of another Sheehanite that spewed the same rhetoric, she said that Presidnt Bush had lied to her son...funny thing though, her son joined the military in 1997 under Clinton. Couldn't figure out how President Bush lied to get her son to join....
I hope her son was a better American that his mother, else I feel sorry for his squad. Why would you WANT your son's death to be in vein?
2007-04-09 03:20:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Just because you disagree with someone, doesn't make their motives less genuine. She is a grieving mom...whose grief prodded her into action to deal with her grief. Anti-War people have gravitated towards her as common support and a common cause. She you uses the crowd and much as the crowd uses her as a form of synergy to their word out. Its still a free country. No different than the Schivo Woman or Ellian Gonzales.
2007-04-09 03:16:12 · answer #7 · answered by Laughing Man Copycat 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Follow the Money, she is funded by anti-war groups, Political action Committees and Moveon.org. Why do you think she can travel the world putting a face on the far-far left agenda.
He son Casey, actually joined on his own accord and re-enlisted and was proud to serve. Even though she has a right to grieve. Sheehan has always been a life long professional protester and now uses his death to promote her agenda.
2007-04-09 03:12:31 · answer #8 · answered by garyb1616 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Rosa Parks, she isn't!!!
I feel for her cause she lost her son, but everything else she does is beyond ridiculous. What does visiting Hugo Chavez have to do with her son dying? I would guess she might still be in some state of shock.
gw
2007-04-09 04:25:14 · answer #9 · answered by georgewallace78 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
How about a pawn of the International Marxist - Socialist -
Communist promoters who always like to stage demonstrations on May first each year.
Please note: You can be certain that any public demonstration staged on May first was organized by some Communist group and that most people involved are either Communists or their ignorant dupes.
Watch out for those demonstrators that want to prevent sealing our borders against importation of contraband and infiltration of their agents.
2007-04-09 03:15:53 · answer #10 · answered by Philip H 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Being used by liberals? She is a liberal! She at least has the balls to not play politics with the war and to speak her mind. She's wrong, but at least she's more concerned with something other than 2008. The dems make me sick.
2007-04-09 03:08:19 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋