They will claim that the Republicans were secretly distorting the data and demand investigations.
Remember, being a Democrat means never having to say you are sorry.
2007-04-09 00:54:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Homeschool produces winners 7
·
6⤊
2⤋
In five or ten years it wont matter what they say. By then Israel will strike Iran to keep themselves from being wiped off the map. This will start WWWIII because Russia/China will honor protection treaties with Iran and then Global Warming will not be an issue at all. What a perfect time to hand the reins over to some retarded liberal Democrat so they can be at the helm after 15-20 years of setting this all up? Wow, I love BUSH!!!!
2007-04-09 03:36:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by jugifu876 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You cannot dump the amount of toxins that go into the atmosphere, earth and water and not have effects from it. What harm is there in living and protecting the planet you live on? Omg, it might actually clean up the air a little and we could never have that. Damn liberal plot it is....cleaner air and water, taking away your smog. Uno, America stayed clean for many thousands of years with the Indians and their respect for the land and living things. Then people moved in and did more damage to this nation with their industry, cars and fuel fires in 100 years than the rest of time combined. Each and every thing we do has an effect. Sorry, this is the only earth we have and I want to do my part to help take care of it. It must be really hard to walk around with your great big head so full of brains moreso than all the scientists that say that global warming is a real and valid threat. Uno what, I bet Saddam started that....bet was the WMD that Bush lied about. Grow up and try reading and researching. Your questions and comments show your lack of intellect. Genius you aren't.
2007-04-09 01:19:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by kolacat17 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
actually the end result of global warming is supposed to be another ice age, the polar caps will supposedly melt, reflecting more sunlight off a greater area of water and cooling the earth down. never mind that were just coming out of an ice age and the earth has been getting steadily warmer for the last 10,000 years.
2007-04-09 00:59:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
we are having very cold weather this week in Kentucky. Its cold outside, must be global warm for sure. 29 degrees in April. Real Global warming.
2007-04-09 01:17:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Then clarify why the measured CO2 ranges are at recorded worldwide records and the Arctic ice is melting. One Forbes article does not replace the actuality that we are destroying rain forests, a source of CO2 conversion into O2 and that we are pumping out CO2 at checklist ranges into the ambience at a cost speedier than nature can convert it returned to O2 and we are pumping methane, a greenhouse gasoline that's 22 cases worse than CO2, into the ambience at checklist ranges. we've customary for nearly 2 hundred years that CO2 and Methane are clean in seen easy and opaque in infrared easy, which ability they take up extra infrared easy, the sunshine than transforms to warmth, than the different atmospheric gases. as a result we are including thermal potential into the ambience. How that ameliorations the climate and climate is UNKNOWN because of the fact the ambience is a complicated equipment to learn, inspite of what Al Gore says. we are able to be certain via one ingredient, we won't be able to shop pumping extra and extra extra thermal potential into the ambience invariably and assume the climate and climate to be the comparable. The result would desire to ensue 10 years from now, two decades from now, 50 years from now, who's conscious? that's undesirable adequate that our grandchildren will would desire to pay down our debt. Now we are going to gamble on their ecosystem as nicely? all the Forbes article ability that we've adequate time to swap to extra efficient aspects of potential, as a replace of the loopy leftists urgings to at cutting-edge bypass off the grid and stay like hippies, like Al Gore supporters say. we are able to improve using photograph voltaic and wind potential because of the fact the p.c.. we are doing it, we are able to discover a thank you to apply much less potential, we are able to discover a thank you to transform large vehicles to run on much less high priced and adequate organic gasoline, with the comparable horsepower and "coolness" because of the fact the gasoline run vehicles. we are able to proceed to have a classic stay via making use of technologies to ween us off of oil for gasoline. we've time. that's what the Forbes article ability.
2016-10-28 06:08:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Global warming is the new religion of the left. They have accepted its dogma and are no longer hearing anything else.
To the believers, questioning global warming or any of its tenets is tantamount to blasphemy. All non-believers are infidels. Any scientist who dares oppose will face the inquisition.
For example, I present the replies you will receive from the believers. It isn't often one sees such zealotry.
.
2007-04-09 01:02:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jacob W 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
While this question is related to liberals and conservatives, the question itself is the same as the asker; unconstructive, only promotes name calling and a waste of political consideration.. Grow up.
2007-04-09 00:54:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by leikevy 5
·
6⤊
1⤋
Liberals would continue to try to reduce pollution, because irrespective of whether there's global warming or not, pollution is harmful to all life.
2007-04-09 00:59:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
If this is a poll, put me down for expecting more BS.
2007-04-09 01:01:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by open4one 7
·
5⤊
2⤋