I hear and see you lefties squealing about freeing Tibet, East Timor, Darfur, and so on...and when Clinton killed thousands upon thousands of civilians in the process of stopping the genocide in the Balkans and thereby helping to win that war, there was no outcry whatsoever...
So will you please admit that it's only your unwarranted hatred of GWB that is undermining our efforts in Iraq, and that you really hate it when America acts in our own best interests instead of only the best interests of the Third World? That you basically just have a problem with America and the basic idea of liberty over socialism?
2007-04-08 23:53:39 · 13 answers · asked by Donald J 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
REPEATEDLY you libs fail to perform basic cognitive processes. I speak of the suspension of certain liberties during wartime--as provided for in the Constitution--not the broad freedoms enjoyed during peacetime and non-emergency periods.
2007-04-09 00:11:41 · update #1
Your the one with the problem dude. Dissent doesn't mean treason. if you think it is than you don't have a freaking clue as to what America is about.
2007-04-08 23:56:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
In congress and in politics in general with a two party system, both parties have to make a stance or else no one would vote for them. However, if you think all democratic ideas represent the ideas of the voters or all republican ideas represent the ideas of the voters, I'm going to have to say that is too black and white. The people you will hear so loudly are extremist.
In reality, you have a lot if people riding ideas of both parties, who are debating within themselves and when election comes, they have to select only one party and whatever party they elect does not fully represent how they feel.
So to answer your question, is a suggestion: dont think all liberals are alike, nor are all conservatives alike. There will be liberals that fit your description but to label all liberals as you did is a dishonest accusation.
2007-04-09 00:23:07 · answer #2 · answered by leikevy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you need to back and read the history of the Balkans. The republicans criticized Clinton ceaselessly for that effort, even passing non binding resolution calling for the US to withdraw. Sound familiar?
2007-04-09 00:58:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Efforts in Iraq? What Are you talking about?
American soldiers are fighting and dying for the big corporations, not for democracy, not for freedom, not for America.
Saddam was a CIA puppet. America gave him weapons and money. You had him all the time. 1.000.000 Iraqi civilians + 3278 American soldiers dead because of a lie. And you still wonder why they hate you ....
2007-04-09 00:02:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
there are a number of diverse reasons for Wars, regardless of the undeniable fact that a lot of human beings blame faith for numerous the worlds wars; i do no longer see this as being real. fairly maximum individuals of wars are led to via conflicts of potential or as a manner to benefit supplies. WW1- conflicts of potential via diverse eu alliances. WW2- conflicts of potential because of the Nazis choose for an eu empire. Gulf wars- supplies, Hussein and the Petro dollar. even whilst different motives are given inclusive of religion or terrorism there is in many cases a hidden schedule. word how no one cares approximately reigemes inclusive of North Korea or Burma.
2016-10-21 10:17:05 · answer #5 · answered by trinkle 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you purport to want liberty over socialism, how can you possibly equate dissent with treason?
2007-04-09 00:06:23 · answer #6 · answered by ash 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Reasons for going to war = a just war = being attacked by another country or the imminent threat of being attacked. Iraq didn't attack the US, it was not threatening to attack, and it did not have the means to attack.
2007-04-09 00:04:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The foreign policies of Washington DC are full of hypocrisy!
2007-04-08 23:58:22 · answer #8 · answered by Sami V 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There are more important issue we need to address before we debate reasons... this is a disappointing newscast about the US:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XvwkDXaCy4
How did it get this far?
2007-04-09 00:53:53 · answer #9 · answered by Humz 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You forgot about BJ-gate. The woman's groups turned their back on poor Monica when she was sexually harassed by America's top boss! I say hand the left some cheese.... it goes so well with WHINE!!!
2007-04-08 23:59:33 · answer #10 · answered by Bosspooba 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would think sending troops to fight in war for false reason would be treason.
2007-04-09 00:01:19 · answer #11 · answered by St. Tom Cruise 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋