I didn't before. No one should now. Lying to start wars that waste our resources, ruins another country, kills innocent civilians, creates a new base of operations for terroristsand costs the lives of good honorable American service members is not hardly pro-life is it? How does pro-war =pro-life?
2007-04-08 15:44:06 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Giovanni, i voted for the other party both elections and protested that damn war from the beginning. all i can do is build opposition in the USA. Unless you know how i can get elected
2007-04-08 15:51:09 · update #1
cj, i am also a veteran of the first Gulf War so please don't preach to me about the sacrifices made i have dead friends from that. I already know about the sacrifices. why waste my brothers on lies?
2007-04-08 15:56:25 · update #2
For some, abortion and a death on a battlefield are two separate actions that are not connected.
As George Carlin stated: "Republicans want live babies so they can become dead soldiers"
2007-04-08 15:52:31 · answer #1 · answered by Experto Credo 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
America's not willing to admit yet that the war in Iraq was a mistake from the start. Too many people are being buffaloed into thinking the war on terror is going to be an offensive war on somebody else's soil (even the wrong people's soil, yes). But yeah, that same segment of society that's still saying the war was justified (if mistakenly executed) is probably still quite pro-life.
2007-04-08 15:49:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
it may be large, however the Republicans are not conservatives anymore - they're neoconservatives. huge difference. Conservatives are generally (as is my information) professional-smaller government and monetary accountability. Neoconservatives on the different hand are what fused the GOP to the religious reich-wing, and that's the place you spot lots of their nuttier systems coming from. Neoconservatives spend. They spend like drunken sailors on conflict and that they attempt to blur the line between church and state. And different than that, it is not that i'm specific what any of their positions are because of the fact they alter them every time its handy. don't sense undesirable - the GOP has alienated a brilliant style of persons who in the past could have been of their social gathering. you at the instant are not the only one - there are various.
2016-10-02 09:46:14 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most of the f'ups were from Democrats. The Republicans heal the f ups they did, and it take a long time, then the people see that Republicans aren't doing good, or so it seems. Then the Democrats have their president, he's now f'n up again, while what the Republican president did is now showing and all the people think that the Democrat president is the one making it all good. Then bam, they happen to F up again and people vote for a Republican president and it goes back and forth from there...
Anyways, Bush did right. He's helping to save the lives and all the people wanted this to happen that are over there.. Republican4life
2007-04-08 15:50:20 · answer #4 · answered by kingj0n 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Well, if by pro-life you mean anti-abortion, there's also the fact that the Republicans refused to pass a Constitutionally-sound late-term abortion ban, and instead passed one they knew would not survive a Constitutional challenge.
If you're a politician looking to score points and rally your right-wing religious base, that was a smart move. If you're a person who believes that the abortions that were performed as a result are murder, it was mass murder for political purposes.
2007-04-08 15:50:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Stereotyping. You cant judge man by others. That is where ignorance creeps in. You dont vote Republican? Why? If you go back in history you will find WWI,WWII,Korea and Vietnam all were with Democratic Presidents. You vote for who is the better person to do the job. Peace out.....................
2007-04-08 15:50:43 · answer #6 · answered by powerliftingrules 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You asked this same question in 1973, didn't you? And your thoughts on the war in Iraq are generic, right?
There is big different between fighting and dying for what one believes is right, the killing of innocent unborn babies. Even you should be able to figure that out, can't you? Are you Jane Fonda in real life, or just a reasonable facsimile thereof?
2007-04-09 04:13:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Whether the current war is right or wrong, sometimes war is necessary to preserve the freedom that we have to even be able to vote Republican or Democrat. No one, including the current administration, wants to see innocent lives lost, but if the alternative is the loss of our freedom, it's a sacrifice that thousands of people have gladly given their lives for.
2007-04-08 15:52:12 · answer #8 · answered by cj_justme 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I live in Europe, but I follow your elections always closely. I need to, because that's how democracy on our planet works: 5% of the world's population decides who becomes the new 'world leader'. That world leader decides on which countries will face wars, etc.
I know, huge generalization, but you get the point.
I'm an atheist, if I knew how to pray, I'd pray for Hillary.
2007-04-08 15:51:30 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I wasn't old enough to vote in the past elections but you couldn't pay me to vote Republican. The Democrats may not be that great but I'd vote for a monkey before I ever voted for a Republican.
2007-04-08 15:48:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋