English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

For those lemmings that mindlessly suck up any nonsense bush spews.

Do the events of 9/11 not constitute a "Pearl Harbor" type event, like the one mentioned by pnac?

http://www.pnac.info/

2007-04-08 15:15:18 · 6 answers · asked by starts_with_f_ends_with_ck 1 in Politics & Government Politics

Funny I do a yahoo search on American Journal of Physics 9/11 and the first hit I get is http://www.journalof911studies.com/
which you claim doesn't qualify.

2007-04-09 02:51:18 · update #1

6 answers

The Hopeless Stupidity Of 9/11 Conspiracies.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/11818067/the_low_post_the_hopeless_stupidity_of_911_conspiracies/1

2007-04-08 15:21:32 · answer #1 · answered by bugeyes 4 · 2 1

Again, you avoid answering the real questions and fall back on the trusty PNAC talking points.

FYI: Some basic peer-reviewed journals in science which may be applicable to the destruction of the WTC Towers. American Journal of Physics (AJP), Physics Today, Physical Review Letters, American Journal of Chemistry, Journal of Metallurgy, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Scientific American, or American Journal of Materials Science.

Wait, could it be? Msi_cord might know what the hell he is talking about.

2007-04-08 22:27:46 · answer #2 · answered by msi_cord 7 · 3 0

I love it.

So, the "neo-con's" decide that they need a "Pearl Harbor" type event to initiate their drive for global domination. Being the evil criminals that they are, they create a massive conspiracy, involving hundreds if not thousands of "neo-con" drones in a complex series of events leading to the deaths of some 3,000 innocent Americans and having a devastating effect on the U.S. economy. Obviously, the "neo-con" leaders and drones are all sworn to secrecy for life...apparently under penalty of death as nothing leaks to others in the government or the media.

Four years later, one of the head "neo-con's" publishes an article in which he allegedly exposes the "conspiracy" that has now remained buried for going on five years. Is he an idiot...or simply taunting all the 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists...effectively "daring" them to uncover the "truth"?

It makes complete sense...if you are wearing a tin foil fez!

2007-04-08 22:27:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Why don't you just answer the other posters questions. They weren't that hard.

2007-04-08 22:20:24 · answer #4 · answered by ohbrother 7 · 3 0

another lemming comment from a parrot...I love it.

2007-04-08 22:45:36 · answer #5 · answered by u_bin_called 7 · 2 0

no

2007-04-08 22:18:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers