Is feeding the hungry people more important than fighting?

Question

Is that better than discussing who thinks they know the most about the Universe?

Answer 1

Yes it is, although, if we don't keep the fighting under control, we wouldn't be able to care for the amount of people that would starve to death. Many would be caught in the cross fire, homes and businesses would be lost.
If you were to stop most wars, people wouldn't go hungry as much, less money would be spent on war, and more would be able to be done about the hungry people.

Answer 2

Hard to answer that . All depends on the fight. It is certainly important to feed the hungry. Be it human or animal. so how about equally as important.

Answer 3

well, feeding hungry people and killing others who believe differently are both time-honored traditions in both Christianity and Islam, so while the average Joe probably would go with the "feeding the hungry thing", religious leaders and politicians seem to favor the killing thing.

Answer 4

to me its a complicated subject ... people starve because govts are corrupt and somebody is hording all the wealth and resources of a place ... then theres the factor of if u just feed a nation of hungry people and dont fix the real problem then they just breed faster and multiply the problem ... so maybe fighting does need to be involved in a round about way ....

Answer 5

I believe feeding the hungry is top priority.

Answer 6

both are important God would have us do both. If you are discussing you are no fighting. Communication is need to stay in contact and proclaim Gods word.

Answer 7

Yes, caring people first is more important.

Answer 8

there's no comparison in my mind--starvation should not exist anymore