English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-04-08 12:58:58 · 13 answers · asked by The Raging Monkey 5 in Politics & Government Military

by "us" I mean the rest of the world, I say "we" since I'm from Canada

2007-04-08 13:24:05 · update #1

13 answers

It has already happened. In WWII the US, Britain (and all the forces under her command) and China were allies.

In that instance, the Axis forces were, as you said, screwed.

Nowadays, I am not so sure.

2007-04-09 04:24:40 · answer #1 · answered by KNUCKLES57 2 · 0 0

US, Britain, and China vs. everyone else...

I think it's an unlikely combination, but I'll play the game.

Three major "groups" would be a major issue with this one:

Russia - Nuclear power and close to China.

Japan - Major economic power and trade partner to the US and China.

The European Union - Major economic and regional military power.

In this situation, the US Navy and Coast Guard would likely be able to control coastal waters of China and the US to a degree and interdict and/or destroy other major clusters of naval vessels and merchant traffic. Controlling everything is not an option and doing more than protecting fleets between the different allies, until some of the other regional forces are contained. Because of this, anything more than short term warfare would require suppression of enemy means to destroy our merchant traffic and some form of normalizing trade.

Militarily, the immediate suppression of and occupation or demilitarizing of Mexico, Canada, North Korea, the Russian Far East, and India would be top priorities. With these countries demilitarized, there would be a greater level of security for those involved and the chance to set up wartime production and trade. If Canada was occupied, The Russian Far East occupied, and Japan "persuaded" to be a good little trading partner again, the only major resource that would need to be accounted for is oil...

Additionally, this set up would control a sizable percentage of the world's productive agricultural land and likely have a food surplus that might be barterable into an advantageous peace treaty later on...

Assuming, of course, everyone resisted going full scale nuclear.

2007-04-08 21:45:02 · answer #2 · answered by Deathbunny 5 · 0 0

What about Russia and Japan ?

I dont want to take over the world, nor do I wish for my government to do so, they already taking over all of America, including our kids schools !!

Governments a peoples ENEMY. Are you blind ?
*LOL*, Canada is to close to US for them to do anything stupid, but with the governments we have had for 30 yrs, I would say...thats what they want to do, not just the world,,but to take over their own people as well.

2007-04-08 21:13:05 · answer #3 · answered by fivefootnuttinhuny 3 · 0 0

I don't get your question. We annexed Canada back in '72. You no longer fall into the rest of the world category. (Except for Quebec).

2007-04-08 20:38:30 · answer #4 · answered by Pooky Bear the Sensitive 5 · 1 1

We, the US, have enough nuclear weapons to destroy the world 5 times over. not a bragging point, however, it would have to be your definition of win or screwed.

the days of fighting a country's is over, we will fight people of religion as we have in the past.

God help us all.

2007-04-08 20:10:38 · answer #5 · answered by favoritson 2 · 0 1

Everyone in Lebanon, Egypt, Iraq, Iran, Pakistan, Afganistan< and other terrorist-state countries would be screwed...

2007-04-08 20:02:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Did it ever dawn on you to mention who..."we" is and what country or countries you "we" people are from? I might help in answering you question.

Well...probably not..... Yeah, I'd put you and the the we people in the column marked: SCREWED

2007-04-08 20:14:50 · answer #7 · answered by iraq51 7 · 1 1

Well,,,,,yeah if you weren't from US, Britain or China.

2007-04-08 20:07:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

that would be enough to take over the world it would be nice to have the Japanese on the team.

2007-04-08 20:04:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I guess that means that here, in Australia, we'd be extremely screwed! - lol

2007-04-08 20:50:43 · answer #10 · answered by mattcolin87 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers