English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It can't be Ted Haggard because he got caught

2007-04-08 08:34:30 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

5 answers

Nah, ol' Jerry is a master manipulator, who got rich by playing to the fears of the weak, and a bigot hiding behind scripture. He's also a fruitcake, like his buddy, Pat Robertson. He blamed 9/11 on us, because we "embraced homosexuals" and "turned away from God." Personally, I never embraced a homosexual in my life. I've shaken hands with a few, though. At any rate, Falwell isn't the Antichrist. He might be inherently evil, and a bald-faced liar, but he'll never be as powerful as he wants to be, fortunately for us and the rest of the world.

2007-04-08 08:49:12 · answer #1 · answered by link955 7 · 2 0

No. He's ruthless enough, I think -- but nowhere near attractive enough.

Haggard would have made a better candidate (before he got caught) because at least he's kinda sorta good-looking, and doesn't the story suggest that the ultimate archenemy is very attractive to both men and women?

2007-04-08 08:42:39 · answer #2 · answered by ? 7 · 1 0

No, the Anti Christ will probably come from the Middle East, according to most bible scholars.

2007-04-08 08:42:16 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 1 0

The anti-Christ is a government.

2007-04-08 08:40:23 · answer #4 · answered by Me 6 · 1 1

I'm definitely not one of his fans.

2007-04-08 08:40:08 · answer #5 · answered by E.T.01 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers