In my opinion OJ was 100 percent guilty and definitely got away with murder.
Think about it: His blood was found on the scene of the crime, he had just bought a knife that was possibly used and the same bloody glove that he bought also was found on his premises containing OJs and the murder victims blood. In addition blood from the victims was found in his vehicle clothing etc. He then tried to flee the state after doing the murder. He had an extensive history of domestic violence, and had unmercifully beaten Nicole in the past. You could not ask for a better case or more clear guilt than this. There is absolutely no question he was guilty. Here is the problem with the case. The prosecutors were terrible for one. Mark Fuhrman (one of the lead detectives) was found to have no credibililty whatsover and possibly ruined the case due to this by putting a doubt in the jurys minds.
OJ spent millions on attorneys that clearly lied, created false witnesses and decieved the inept jurors. His attorneys clearly knew of his guilt but it just shows what money can buy and I could never understand how a lawyer can do that...how they sleep at night....it is sick. OJ actually paid 3 million to a firm just to help with jury selection who determined that B/Fs would be the best for him as they would feel sorry and have sympathy for him. 3 million just to select a jury!!!
His attorney Johny Cochran was treated as a hero and was simply a paid liar who deserved no credit or notoraity for this as he was totally aware of his clients guilt. He blamed police for framing him (absurd) and made up various deceptions to confuse the jurors. To me he was almost as guilty as OJ for what he did. While he was raking in millions from OJ, Cochrans brother, a crack addict, was murdered in an LA slum. Although the murderer was never caught I wonder how Cochran would feel if the killer was rich and hired Roy Black to get him off for the crime.
OJ now lives like a king, abusing other woman, and having been arrested for various incidents involving fighting. He gets an NFL pension that can not be touched by the courts that is worth millions. He goes golfing all the time and lives in a large nice home. In public he is treated like a hero, with autograph seekers and people actually hugging him. I wonder how they would feel if it was their family that was victimized by him?
2007-04-08 10:27:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by flafuncop 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes. I never knew who he was until the trial came up so I have no prejudged attitudes towards him. I would have had doubts if he had not been proven to have repeatedly beaten his ex wife for years and they had pictures of the abuse and the 911 phone call she made after a beating. No one had any reason to kill Nicole and the man she was with EXCEPT for OJ simpson. Everyone knows he got away with murder. The only positive thing is that because he is in such a spot light now for the crime, he will most likely never beat or kill another woman. Because if he beats anyone else it will be all over the news and the courts would throw the book at him. And his famous lawyer isnt alive anymore to defend him.
I hope nicole's kids are being cared for by loving relatives and I hope they never have to be left alone with OJ.
2007-04-08 10:01:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Educated 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
He was found not guilty in the murder trial but guilty in the civil suits.
He was a known violent man, he had beat Nicole on many occasions, that is why she left. It is very common for abusive men to eventually kill their spouses or ex-spouses that is the main reason so many abused women are afraid to leave their husband since they are often threatened with murder. Statistics show men who beat their partners often eventually kill those partners.
It is not unfathomable to image him doing it, no matter how "sweet" he pretends to be (it seems so fake, I have an uncle just like that) we all have seen the photos of her beaten badly and heard the 911 tape of her hiding in the bushes afraid... no good man does that.
The monster he was behind closed doors is not the person he shows to the public.
2007-04-08 09:58:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Twigglet 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
the US courts no longer look at who is truly guilty or innocent. we examine who can put on the best show -the defense or the proscecuter- and make our decisions that way. our decisions are based on whom we like better.
the result of the civil case proved that OJ was guilty.
2007-04-08 08:06:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by KitKat 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Clearly Guilty..
2007-04-08 07:47:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Ah. In my opinion? Guilty as Casey f*cking Anthony.
2016-05-20 00:43:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by anjanette 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Now it is coming out that the LAPD were on the scene far earlier than the time testified to at trial. They were there shortly after 11pm. You will recall that Marcia Clark kept the time frame steady at after 12 that night. But the police were there around 11.
That changes everything.,
Also, the Bruno Maglis were shoeprints made by a female, not a male. Nicole Simpson wore a size 11 woman's shoe. she had big feet.
She was found barefoot. But there was no blood on her feet, at all, despite the area being saturated with blood..
Someone else had put her shoes on that night in order to get away
...and it wasn't OJ.
There are hundreds of other clues which were never brought out at trial.
I understand someone has countered the "evidence" --and that sometime in the fall, the truth will come out.
Finally
2007-04-08 07:52:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by rare2findd 6
·
1⤊
6⤋
No. OJ was a wealthy man doing what wealthy people do...hire lawyers to lie and cloud events to their favor.
USA is organized crime with enough lawyers to defend the devil himself. Look at war criminals Bush/Cheney in plain sight?
How many thousands of innocent African American men have been lynched in the filthy USA? It is a maggot nation of hypocrites, a true cesspool. There is no justice, only a fool expects it. Some Americans got a small taste of what was forced on the world by the filthy USA for decades.
2007-04-08 08:12:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
"If it fits (meaning the bloody glove), you must convict!" Hell, that bone head wasn't even a good poet!
Does it even matter if OJ was guilty or not? He'll still have to meet with his final judge...
2007-04-08 07:51:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Found not guilty in legal courts, found guilty guilty in the court of public opinion. Just look at the way he would run through airports, what a terrorist. lmao.
Personally I don't give a rats a55. I didn't use his number. duhh!
What a waste of time, and his money by the goldsteins?
2007-04-08 08:25:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Wonka 5
·
0⤊
3⤋