climate change
Global warming is a very complex collection of many effects
this text is limited to effects of people in the country,industrial effects on the environment and the internal combustion engine as well as the over all effects of cities ,is another story
climate change is causedfor a great part by desertification ,and most desertification is caused by man
the thinner ozone layer helps to speed this up.and this is caused mainly by air polution ,also as a result of mans actions
MANS EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT
Mono cultures ,aided by chemicals Exhaust and pollutes the soil .
Adding to this the effects of overgrazing has resulted in large scale desertification.
expanding populations and expanding farming ,that has to keep pace with the expanding populations are very strong forces that encroach upon the rainforest's
clearing them for farming and settlement areas .
Rainforest's always are in third world countries and always in third world countries corruption and the need for money s highest
go to the countries on the equator ,check what has happened in history
and listen to what is going on in the many disaster areas on this planet today,(and there are more each year )
there are natural cycles in the planets life
but a lot is influenced by mans existance ,and this is increasing with overpopulation,putting strains on Natural resources and increasing contaminations as well as destructions of essential componants the ensure living conditions for all life forms
in North Africa,India,Mexico ,millions of people are effected by land loss and desertification and some have died as a result
in china, thousands of what used to be farmers are running for their lives from the dust storms that have burried their towns and turned their lands into dessert,
,the Sahara is growing by 7 kilometers a year
and all of the desserts we know are a results of mans actions ,and they are increasing ,not getting less ,in the dinosaurs days ,there were no desserts.
collectively this planet is drying up because of bad farming practices like,over grazing and fertilizers,
each degree rise in temperature means 10%crop loss
and there is less and less water (because of deforestation),to irrigate this production ,
and there are less and less farmers to do it..
who are overpumping deep carbon aquifiers
who are plowing more and more unstable lands because they have lost so many million hectares to desertification ,
because of bad farming practises ,such as using fertilizers and heavy machinary or over grazing
RISING SEAS
The northpole is melting ,and we will know it without ice in our life times.
this does not affect the sea level because it is ice that is already in the water.but the melting ice from Green land and the south pole ,are another matter.
POSITIVE ACTIONS
global warming i dont think can be stopped but we can stop helping it becoming faster,this requires global co operation between all countries ,and taking into account human nature and the world politics ,it is unlikely that this will happen,
At least not untill we are all in the middle of planetary disastres and it becomes a battle for the survival of humanity every where.
tell other people to get with it
organize clean ups
these are Al gores sites
http://events.stepitup2007.org/.........
http://www.stepitup2007.org/
http://events.stepitup2007.org/.........
if you want to help the planet ,plant a tree every week ,if everyone on the planet did we we would be able to slowdown the destructive processes
reduce carbon emisions,and they are already working on that by alternative forms of energy and regulations on carbon producing materials,aerosol cans,burning rubbish,industrial chimneys,powerplants etc.
the capture of carbon and the production of water and assist the aquiferous manta.
the world bank pays large subsidies for reforrestation to capture carbon and the best tree for this is the Pawlonia
Waterharvesting projects ,such as millions of small dams.to redirect over ground waterflows from the rains into the ground to supply subteranian water supplies.
the protection of existing forrests.
stop building more highways,urban planning to include vegetation stop building cities encourage people to return to the land to conduct their business from there which now has become possible thanks to the internet.
education to motivate people to auto sufficiency by building more home food gardens.
education on environmental awareness
education on family planning to curb over´populaion
Agricultural education and improvements to follow the principals or sustainability and soil management.
more environmental or land ,design to prevent bush fires,such as--fire breaks
,more dams.regulations and control for public behaviour
alternative effeciant public transport to discourage the use of the internal conbustion engine
recicling wastes,limit water use
here are a 100 more ways
http://www.eco-gaia.net/forum-pt/index.p...
2007-04-08 07:55:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Was this a question, or a rant? But to answer the question, yes global warming is happening and has been for about 20,000 years (just look at the data). What would you have me do to help?
2007-04-08 20:18:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes.
There's a completely overwhelming amount of scientific data showing that it's real and caused mostly by man.
Short version:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Climate_Change_Attribution.png
The best summary of the data:
http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf
The data is why scientists know it's mostly us and not the sun, volcanoes, etc. The data is why the vast majority of scientists think it's real. Proof.
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686
What's going to happen if we don't start doing something about it now:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6538779,00.html
http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM6avr07.pdf
These people are convinced by the science, in spite of their political beliefs.
"The science of global warming is clear. We know enough to act now. We must act now."
James Rogers, CEO of Charlotte-based Duke Energy.
“With overwhelming scientific evidence that global warming is adversely impacting the health of our planet, the time has come for the Congress to take action.”
Senator Olympia Snowe, Republican, Maine
"I agree with you (Gore) that the debate over climate change is over."
Rep. Dennis Hastert, Republican, Illinois
"Global warming is real, now, and it must be addressed."
Lee Scott, CEO, Wal-Mart
“DuPont believes that action is warranted, not further debate."
Charles O. Holliday, Jr., CEO, DuPont
"We simply must do everything we can in our power to slow down global warming before it is too late. The science is clear. The global warming debate is over."
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Republican, Governor, California
"Our nation has both an obligation and self-interest in facing head-on the serious environmental, economic and national security threat posed by global warming."
John McCain, Republican, Senator, Arizona
That "swindle" movie is wrong. Bad science, long ago refuted.
The director made a similarly silly movie in 1997, which compared environmentalists to Nazis. Channel 4 had to issue a public apology for that one.
"Against Nature argues that greens in First World countries are responsible for the deprivation and death of millions of children in the Third World. In their callous disregard for human welfare and their fetishism of nature, greens, it maintains, are not merely conservative, but fascist, drawing their inspiration from precisely the same ideologies as the Nazis. It would be laughable, had it not been given three hours of prime time TV."
http://www.videonetwork.org/stuff/againstnature.html
This one is similar in quality.
" A Channel 4 documentary claimed that climate change was a conspiratorial lie. But an analysis of the evidence it used shows the film was riddled with distortions and errors."
http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/climate_change/article2355956.ece
Here's a refutation by climate scientists:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/03/swindled/
Bottom line:
http://www.medialens.org/alerts/07/0313pure_propaganda_the.php
"Pure Propaganda"
Even Channel 4 doesn't believe that nonsense is correct. If you go to their website, on the page for the film are links to factual global warming sites. You can "Ask an Expert" and your question goes to a respected mainstream scientist who says man is mostly responsible for global warming.
2007-04-08 16:49:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bob 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Al Gore:
Putting the technology together to start cleaning up and reintroducing new ozone to the atmosphere is possible. The cost and size of this project means taking a long term commitment. I am proposing the biggest cleanup in history. Al, I do not see any proposal that is realistic or proven at any cost, not even Washington can solve this problem. But if every person on earth does his or her share, we may be ok. Never-the-less, I see governments acting like a deer in a car’s headlights and people doing the same thing. The inevitable is almost upon us. Cleanup and change is the only option.
The first cleanup machine starts with a ten billion dollars investment. Ten year later with twenty-five machines operating, these machines will produce enough ozone to replace both holes at the poles. But more importantly, these machines will remove chemicals that deplete the ozone. Beyond making ozone, decreasing the poisons that deplete ozone, these machines reduce the major greenhouse gases and unbelievably we can have all this for fewer than one hundred billion dollars.
Beyond cleaning up our atmospheric mess as I am suggesting, we humans must do a better job reducing or cleaning up carbon monoxide, collecting and storing methane and ethane for fuel, burning less of everything, cleaning up our forests and using more solar insolation. Solar steam electric generators are the type of systems we need and are 90 percent efficient and near 100 percent if heat recovery is used. I believe nearly 30,000 MW are needed in the USA and Mexico over the next 30 years. This opens the door to new electric cars, new construction vital to our way of life, new bullet trains, and these industries produce new high paying jobs. From small scale solar generators on malls, to 2000 acre collector sights, these systems are viable and ready for production. The Federal Government must give up some land, money and have less regulation to help save the planet from disaster.
Al, spreading the message that we can help ourselves is a key to the development of these businesses. Washington can help: the businesses need grants, patents, land and regulations. Congress must create a pollution surcharge. From gas, coal, diesel, wood to cooling towers, from cattle, other ranches to cigarettes, from agriculture burning to airplane passengers, this surcharge can fund parts of these projects and many stationary pollution control devices in general.
Your personal support is very important to getting the atmosphere cleanup started and developing sights for solar generators.
Sincerely,
What more do you want, saved my company $126,000 in 3 years off elect bill?
2007-04-08 13:33:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by RayM 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
It's happening but it's the normal cycle of the earth. It was hotter 60 years ago.
Co2 is not changing the temperature of the earth. The SUN is.
Please watch this documentary from the bbc
:"The Global Warming Swindle"
2007-04-08 13:42:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Yoho 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
As a skeptic I must admit that our best evidence is that global warming is happening and that we are the cause of it.
Every other skeptic also realises that we are causing global warming. Those who do not accept reality are not to be called skeptics.
2007-04-08 13:34:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by bestonnet_00 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes tere is an active global warming cycle going on. Yes, man made polution is contributing to this cycle.
2007-04-08 13:35:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by afreshpath_admin 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
I think it was made up by people that want to tax us and make us live in caves and kill us so we dont create any pollutions
Extremest (not me its the commi's an leberals!)
2007-04-08 14:03:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by loololol 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
I believe it is, but I think that it has more to do with solar activity than with CO2 emissions.
2007-04-08 13:32:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by b_tae 1
·
2⤊
2⤋
No they, bad guys, just want you to think that so you don't pay attention to the real problem. Do you think they would be against what you say if it were not a ploy. DUH
2007-04-08 19:01:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋