English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

That we really did go to war over oil? I get tired of losers complaining that we only get into wars if we get something out of it. Gas is $3.15 a gallon here! I really wish we would actually go to war over oil, at least then we would deserve all the crap people spew about the U.S. For the record, do you know the first contracts for oil that Iraq have sold have been to places like China, India and Vietnam? So the next time you guys try to ***** and moan about the evil America. Read the facts

My Source: http://money.cnn.com/2007/04/05/news/international/iraq_oil/index.htm

2007-04-08 05:28:52 · 8 answers · asked by arkainisofphoenix 3 in Politics & Government Military

8 answers

You're right on target.

Hey....if the next President is a Democrat maybe he will "admit" we really did to war for oil. If it would shut up all the damn losers and their moaning I could forgive the President for lying...even a President who is a Democrat. OUCH...you can't imagine how much that hurt me to say.

2007-04-08 07:03:50 · answer #1 · answered by iraq51 7 · 0 0

Hell ya. I have fought in this war and I wish we would go to war for oil. Maybe we should just trade all the mexicans coming in our contry green cards for barrels of crude! I own a company and having two chevy suburbans, a tahoe and two M997 HMMWV SRT trucks is a night mare! And I agree with the spring water guy. Why doesn't any one complain about paying 7 dollars for the same water that comes out of my well. Hey thats a new idea to pay for my GAS! ..................Shadow Stalker

2007-04-08 12:42:31 · answer #2 · answered by srtfugitiverecoveryagency 4 · 3 1

Bravo-----It was never about oil..The US, over the last 30 years has only gotten 2% of our oil from that region. Most of Iraqi & Iranian oil goes to Asia and Europe.
No one complains about the price of " Spring Water" $1.50 liter = $6.00 gal. Is the Bush Administration responsible for that also??????

2007-04-08 12:34:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

lol yeah and they don't realize if it really was about oil we could have invaded darfur and taken their oil no problem.

and before some fool argues against my statement, yes Darfur has oil. http://www.alertnet.org/thefacts/reliefresources/111885496661.htm

remember when we were told we would only go to darfur if it has oil? lol... looks like those people were WRONG!

hmmm is the whole damn theory about war for oil wrong?

could the far left liberals actually make a mistake?

will they admit to it?

Nahhh... the radical far left is too busy making "Peace rally" signs and dressing up like terrorists like these fine upstanding people.
http://www.zombietime.com/global_day_of_action_march_18_2006/IMG_5825.JPG
not exactly about oil, but i think it explains the mind set the "war for oil" people have

2007-04-08 12:46:30 · answer #4 · answered by Stone K 6 · 1 2

I love your "question". You express my sentiments exactly. Thank you. And the answer to your question is yes.

2007-04-08 12:38:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Wow. YES, that would make all the liberal just pee in their pants!

I feel so enlightened.

2007-04-08 12:52:06 · answer #6 · answered by VMKey 3 · 1 1

I wish

2007-04-08 12:50:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No kidding.

Gas is about 2.90 here.

2007-04-08 13:08:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers