Give me a break... a woman is engaged and about to be married to a rich British snob. She meets a penniless artist and foregoes the life of luxury to spend life with her new love. Are you kidding me? Here's how it would really go down: She marries the rich ****** and begins her life of luxury filled unhappiness. When she needs some attention she rings up her struggling artist lover, after which they meet for a non stop *uck marathon. She uses the wealth she has to keep the struggling artist as a kept man.
A bit more realistic, wouldn't you say?
2007-04-08 03:52:05 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I realize that faggoty turd Jack Dawson bit the farm (sweet!), but Rose had already decided to forego her fiance for life in poverty.
2007-04-08 03:59:03 · update #1
Cut the woman hater crap, I live in the real world. People who come from money don't walk away from it and they are in almost all cases more F-ed up than the "little guy".
2007-04-09 04:37:52 · update #2
Hell yeah, that is so true. I think you need to write some scripts man.
Theres way too many 'romantic' movies out there that dont have a shred of realism in them and Titanic is to blame for all of it.
If only James Cameron had put some T-100s in it, that probablly would have saved the film.
2007-04-08 04:06:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I agree with your argument about the love aspect being unrealistic, but you have to realize that the whole movie is a fantasy. Cameron's used to taking advantage of his creative freedoms. No sea faring vessel as painstakingly well-constructed as the Titanic would ever sink in real life.
2007-04-08 04:34:38 · answer #2 · answered by mcfetii 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know how old you are but you've obviously never been in-love. Real 'in-love' love outweighs anything else in your life. The story was very believable. MOST people would choose real love over 'marrying for money' hands down. She would've married for money (for her mother) and accepted it. But, alas, she falls in love with Jack and when that love fills the void inside of her, it pushes out her need to marry for her mother, for money or for any other reason than her own happiness. Fall in love one day and then it will all be clear to you what I'm talking about. Until then, you just couldn't possibly know. :-) good luck
2007-04-08 04:11:55 · answer #3 · answered by Army Of Machines (Wi-Semper-Fi)! 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No...that would probably only happen in todays society not back in 1912. How would she ring him up anyway? Phones were not really around back then and he was a homeless wanderer without a phone.
2007-04-08 04:00:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Funny how love works. Jerks (or to use your phrase *******)like you seem to think that everything is all about money. Well, bulletin, bulletin, bulletin, IT ISN"T.
Your scenario sucks. I don't know ANYONE who would give up love. Perhaps you need to meet a better class of woman.
2007-04-08 04:08:28 · answer #5 · answered by istitch2 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
in this lifetime, yes but i think when they were floating on that wood, he should have shoved her off and got aboard he's cutier ha ha or i guess they both could have fit.
2007-04-08 03:58:28 · answer #6 · answered by valerie s 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
he wasn't british, just a rich east-coast blue blood. they all talked like that back then.
you have serious female-hatred issues.
2007-04-08 04:00:21 · answer #7 · answered by mesquitemachine 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
exelent observation women always go for weath over the nice guy.
2007-04-08 03:57:43 · answer #8 · answered by joshcarnagey 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
yeah..kind of. but i love the song though.. (my heart will go on by Celine dion)
2007-04-08 03:57:35 · answer #9 · answered by Purple Ninja 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
She can't ring up her true love.
He's dead, and at the bottom of the atlantic.
2007-04-08 03:56:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋